鲍威尔说她已经在佐治亚州释放了克拉肯

十六号码头

内容十分庞大，等专业人士总结

白头山伟人金正恩

感谢你的发帖我的朋友

Deatholder ^黑名单回复白头山伟人金正恩

>>感谢你的发帖我的朋友

不客气

upgraded

104 页，虽然没有圣经厚，但里面的资料还蛮丰富的，英文不好，唯有等待高人来解读了。

这次如果司法能够站稳脚步，很多百万富翁，名人，政客都要被审判。

家里的酒是为了庆祝川普当选的时候喝的，现在看来可以放入冰箱，准备庆祝了。

SidneyPowell 说： If you thought Georgia was good, wait until you get to Michigan. Hope you haven’t run out of popcorn.

请确定你有足够的爆米花。

林紫竹

哈哈哈哈，MURRAY的热门回复，这位Biden支持者非常仔细的挑出文件中单词拼写错误和标点使用错误。

咬文嚼字的Biden支持者大概很难对Trump支持者在选票问题上的较真感同身受呢~~~：D

Hayashi

原告共有八人
其中六人是Georgia GOP提名選舉人
Coreco Ja’Qan (“CJ”) Pearson/ Vikki Townsend Consiglio/ Gloria Kay Godwin/ James Kenneth Carroll / Carolyn Hall Fisher/ Cathleen Alston Latham
另外兩人分別為 Georgia Cobb County 共和黨主席 Jason M. Shepherd
及Georgia共和黨副秘書 Brian Jay Van Gundy

被告共有六人
分別為
Georgia
州長 Brian Kemp
州務卿Brad Raffensperger
四名選委會成員 Rebecca N. Sullivan / David J. Worley / Matthew Mashburn/ Anh Le

他們控訴有人用多種非法行為操控選舉令Joe Biden可以成為今屆美國總統
法律術語不翻譯直接跳過去講訴訟書提及過的選舉不公/舞弊的的容.

—作案人用多種方法來操控選舉　覆蓋整個Georgia 其中最嚴重的County為Forsyth, Paulding, Cherokee, Hall同Barrow County

Dominion的軟件問題

—Dominion軟件在這場舞弊案裡面擔當最重要的角色州長、州務卿以及選委會被告急於購入這套軟件
—曾經是Smartmatic旗下的Sequoia voting machines，於2006年向十六個州及 District of Colombia 被廣泛利用
—Smartmatic的業務集中向委內瑞拉及其他國外地區，賺取接近100M美金
—Smartmatic後來賣給Sequoia這間公司 Smartmatic的主席曾經表示希望可以同Sequoia 向美國境內合作
—Smartmatic同Dominion都由委內瑞拉獨裁者Hugo Chavez建立，而他生產這套系統的目的，就是要他永保總統寶座（根據相關的Whistleblower的宣誓証言) 在此之後 Hugo Chavez 果然「贏得」每場選舉
—Smartmatic軟件系統可以隱藏操控的痕跡無論任何審計方法都查他不了這個設計是Chavez最堅持的一點

那麼軟件設計是如何做到這一點的呢?
First, the system's central accumulator does not include a protected real-time audit log that maintains the date and time stamps of all significant election events. Key components of the system utilize unprotected logs. Essentially this allows an unauthorized user the opportunity to arbitrarily add, modify, or remove log entries, causing the machine to log election events that do not reflect actual voting tabulations—or more specifically, do not reflect the actual votes of or the will of the people.

因為我不是IT人. 所以這段我無強行硬譯. 找了位IT朋友幫手解釋.
首先,在所有重大的選舉中, 系統的中央累計算功能並沒有
包含受保護的含有日期和時間的實時驗証記錄系統的主要部份利用未受保護的記錄. 實質上容許一個未經授權的用戶可以有機會任意地增加,修改,移除記錄造成機器未能如實反映真實的投票統計更甚者,未能反映真實的投票者意願

他說最最最簡單來講就是這套軟件不會在中央核心記錄(CPU) 入面加入保護機制令到任何人可以隨意修改記錄而這一點正正反映了這套軟件違反了選舉軟件的安全標準。這套軟件可以連線到網絡亦違反州及聯邦法律

Fulton County 點票中心工作人員說謊

—向Fulton County其中一個大型點票中心 State Farm Arena 向十一月三號報稱點票中心漏水所以要關閉票站所有點票工作人員同監票人都在晚上十點被趕離點票中心
—但是有若干點票工作人員繼續操作電腦同選舉軟件直到凌晨一點
—控方有State Farm Arena的Video　以此為証

州長及州務卿與Dominion之間的可疑行為

—兩位急忙為2020年總統大選於2019年大量購入Dominion的投票機同軟件
—州務卿出了張証書給Dominion系統但這張証書並無標明日期
—Michael Walker作為Project Manager簽發的評測報告也無標明日期
—兩位無視所有關於Dominion安全憂患. 比如2018年 Texas因為軟件問題拒絕使用. 比如2019年加州大學有報告過這套軟件的兒戲程度寫報告的博士寫了隻程式可以於七分鐘加支螺絲起子就hack到整個系統
—前軍方情報分析師聲明中國同伊朗特務用Dominion操控過多場國外選舉. 包括2020年的美國大選這份聲明包括一份專利紀錄表明Eric Coomer是Dominion首位投資者
—專家 Navid Keshavarez-Nia說美國情報機關製造了一些工具去入侵外國投票系統其中包括Dominon。Dominion是極度脆弱的系統. 不需要授權就可以改變搖擺州份的選舉資料. 有極大量的選票由川普名下調去拜登. (Navid Keshavarez-Nia Sr. Vice President for Cyber Intel & CISO Black Key Solutions, LLC 這位專家有三十年嘅國家安全相關經驗)

*不在判決書內但GA於大選前兩個月左右有班律師打過官司他們希望用紙代替Dominion 因為認為這套軟件太大風險州務卿說律師們將一件小事講到世界末日一樣.

可疑郵寄選票

有最少96600張absentee ballots 無回郵記錄. 直接計入得票.

故意漏計川普選票

作案人士低估了川普的得票只能採取漏记他的選票的方式。從重新點票的時候發現那些遺失的記憶卡裡面川普的選票比起拜登多就可見一二。

選舉人員的刻意刁難
—他們當中有部份人可能知道Dominion是可疑的軟件，亦可能不知情，但他們拒絕安保人員去看他們用Dominion點票
—他們無核對郵寄選票簽名
—他們不允許別人監票
以上種種已足以構成選舉舞弊

其實來到這裡都只是引言。

以上轉自連登網友本人將原廣東話翻譯為國語。

https://lih.kg/2301284
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區

十六号码头回复 upgraded

>>104 页，虽然没有圣经厚，但里面的资料还蛮丰富的，英文不好，唯有等待高人来解读了。这次如果司法能够...

亿万富翁们不会坐以待毙。

这次要准备上中下三策

上策争取一战打败沼泽、川普连任

中策争取让大多数美国人民了解真相，削弱拜登伪政权的合法性，为大规模公民不服从运动做准备

下策美国沦为寡头黑帮联合统治，美国人民被迫重拾1776精神，准备新的独立革命

十六号码头回复 Hayashi

>>原告共有八人其中六人是Georgia GOP提名選舉人Coreco Ja’Qan (“CJ”) P...

非常感谢

KC1984 ^黑名单回复 Hayashi

>>原告共有八人其中六人是Georgia GOP提名選舉人Coreco Ja’Qan (“CJ”) P...

红杉资本这条线大概率还会摸到中共那边去。这些年作为在中国国内大力投资的资本公司，要说没几个代理人是不可能的。这场戏大了

~~陪你去看毛新宇~~ ^观察

前50条概括

We only need to prove there were enough irregularities to doubt the result, not to prove what the votes might have been if they were regular according to the ruling of Mead v. Sheffield.
The fraud was committed to make certain Biden would be President. 3.The fraud was committed many different ways, but the most obvious was the new method of “ballot-stuffing.” It was made practically invisible through computer software and run by both foreign and domestic parties. Affidavits from multiple witnesses, documentation, and expert testimony back up the mathematical and statistical impossibilities of this scheme that happened all across the state of Georgia. The worst occurred in Forsyth, Paulding, Cherokee, Hall, and Barrow Counties. This fraud effects tens of thousands of votes and rigged the election for Biden.
The fraud begins with Dominion which was recently purchased and rushed into use by Gov. Kemp, SoS Raffensperger, and Georgia Board of Elections.
Smartmatic and Dominion were founded by foreign bad guys to use computerized ballot-stuffing and vote manipulation to ensure dictator Hugo Chavez never lost another election. (Have a whistleblower affidavit to back up claim.)
More details on design of Smartmatic software.
A basic part of the software’s design is its ability to hide the manipulation of votes from attempts at an audit.
Dominion software functions much the same way. It does not keep track of the date and time stamps of the ballot counts and the logged information is not protected. This lets an unauthorized user add, change, or remove log entries so they do not reflect the actual will of the people.
Since it is possible to alter the logs, it does not meet standards to be considered for an audit. There is physical evidence that the physical security of the voting machines and the software were breached and that they were connected to the internet which is against professional standards and against state and federal laws.
Fraud is also clear in the lies and conduct of the Fulton County election workers by delaying voting at State Farm Arena and their reasons for the delay.
Video from the Arena show on Nov. 3rd after the polls closed, election workers lied about a water leak causing the facility to close. All poll workers and challengers were evacuated for several hours at about 10 p.m., but several election workers stayed behind working at the computers for the voting tabulation machines until after 1 a.m.
Kemp and Raffensperger rushed through the purchase of Dominion in 2019 for the 2020 election. A certificate from the SoS was awarded to Dominion but it is undated. Also, a test report is signed by Michael Walker as Project Manager but is also undated. (they have both documents)
Kemp and Raffensperger ignored concerns that caused Texas to reject them in 2018, like vulnerabilities to non-auditable manipulation. (A professional, Dr. Andrew Appel, wrote how to hack such a voting machine with a screwdriver within 7 minutes- they have this study attached)
Dominion was accessed by agents acting on behalf of China and Iran to monitor and manipulate elections including the most recent US general election in 2020. Eric Coomer is listed on the patent records as the first of the inventors of Dominion. (This is backed up by a former electronic intelligence analyst’s affidavit)
This intelligence analyst, Navid Keshavarez-Nia, says U.S. intelligence services created systems, including Dominion, to manipulate data in battleground states. He says that hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for Trump in 2020 were transferred to Biden.
Indisputable records from the Board of Elections show at least 96,600 absentee ballots were requested and counted but were never recorded as turned in by the voter. At the minimum, all of these votes must be discarded (attached affidavit shows proof)
Dominion makes it impossible to reconcile the number of voters to the number of ballots cast. This was apparent when 3,300 votes were found on memory sticks that were not uploaded election night, and 2,600 absentee ballots in Floyd county had not been scanned. These “found votes” reduced Biden’s lead over Trump. (This allegation is documented and the document is cited)
Georgia election officials and poll watchers, wittingly or unwittingly, helped Dominion carry out massive voter fraud by refusing to follow legal safeguards for absentee ballots. They didn’t verify signatures or check security envelopes. They prevented challengers from observing the count.
Expert analysis shows that at least 96,600 votes were illegally counted. All of the evidence and allegations mentioned is more than enough to place the result of this election in doubt. More evidence arrives by the day and discovery should be ordered immediately.
Georgia law lets the results of an election be contested where: Misconduct, fraud, or irregularities could change or call into doubt the result of the election, when illegal votes are received or legal votes are rejected to such an amount that it could change or call into question the result. If there is any error in counting the votes or declaring the result of the election, or for any other cause that another was the person legally elected.
All of the above have occurred and the Court is obligated to set aside the 2020 results which fraudulently show Biden as the winner.
There are also plenty of Constitutional grounds to set aside the election results due to the failure to follow the law in processing and counting absentee ballots which led to the tabulation of more than 50,000 illegal ballots. The Parties
Plaintiff Coreco Ja’Qan Pearson (a Georgia resident and Elector) wants to decertify the election results.
Plaintiff Vikki Townsend Consiglio (a registered voter from Georgia and Elector)
Plaintiff Gloria Kay Godwin (registered voter from Georgia and Elector)
Plaintiff James Kenneth Carroll (registered voter from Georgia and Elector)
Plaintiff Carolyn Hall Fisher (registered voter from Georgia and Elector)
Plaintiff Cathleen Alston Latham (registered voter from Georgia and Elector)
Plaintiff Jason M. Shepherd (Chairman of Cobb County Republican Party) brings case forward in official capacity on behalf of Cobb County Rep. Party.
Plaintiff Brian Jay Van Gundy (registered voter in Georgia and Assis. Secretary of Georgia Rep. Party)
Defendant Governor Brian Kemp is mentioned in his official role as Governor of Georgia. He bought the new Dominion Voting Systems for GA, budgeting $150 million for them despite Democrats fighting it and pointing to experts who warned it would lead to hacking and tampering. (Article proving these assertions cited)
Defendant Brad Raffensperger is mentioned in his official role as Secretary of State of GA and as Chief Election Official for GA. He is in this lawsuit because he has the responsibility to enforce election laws. (cites laws that prove his responsibilities)
Defendants Rebecca N. Sullivan, David J. Worley, Matthew Mashburn, and Anh Le: Members of the State Election Board. (cites their responsibilities according to GA law) Jurisdiction and Venue
This Court has jurisdiction over this case. (cites law)
This court has jurisdiction over the information in this case as it involves a federal election (cites law)
More citing of law stating the Court has jurisdiction.
More citing of law stating the Court has jurisdiction.
More citing of law stating the Court has jurisdiction.
According to the Constitution, state legislatures have power over elections and state executive officers like Raffensperger don’t have that power. Statement of Facts
Plaintiffs are filing this suit because rights and privileges under the Constitution were violated. They also dispute the election results. (cites relevant laws)
The Constitution explains who has power to regulate elections.
The Constitution lays out who can and can’t be an Elector.
Neither Defendent (Kemp,Raffensperger, or Elections Board Members) has the power to change laws and have to abide by the laws (cites laws)
While the Elections Clause does not diminish a State’s ability to determine its own lawmaking process, it does hold states accountable to their chosen processes. (cites laws)
Plaintiffs call this election result into contest because it shows all the signs of having been fraudulent according to GA law (cites law)
Cites law on how Presidential Electors are elected.
The GA Legislature said to follow the laws already in existence about how to handle absentee ballots.(cites GA law)
Lists steps meant to be taken to count absentee ballots and emphasizes that according to law the registrar or clerk will need to write the day and hour of receipt of the ballot on the envelope, then compare the identifying information on the ballot with the information on file, and if everything looks correct, will need to sign or initial below the voter’s oath.
Points out that GA law also explains what to do if the registrar or clerk have failed to sign on the outside of the envelope or that the signature does not match the signature on file at the registrar or clerk’s office.
Emphasizes the following in GA law: If the elector has failed to sign the oath, or if the signature does not appear to be valid, or information given does not match that on file with the registrar or clerk’s office, the ballot will be rejected and the elector will be notified of the rejection and a copy of the notification will be kept on file for at least one year.