鲍威尔说她已经在佐治亚州释放了克拉肯
https://twitter.com/SidneyPowell1/status/1331826386449915904?s=19
https://docdro.id/e3rhDCz
文件
https://docdro.id/e3rhDCz
文件
25 个评论
前50条概括
- We only need to prove there were enough irregularities to doubt the result, not to prove what the votes might have been if they were regular according to the ruling of Mead v. Sheffield.
- The fraud was committed to make certain Biden would be President. 3.The fraud was committed many different ways, but the most obvious was the new method of “ballot-stuffing.” It was made practically invisible through computer software and run by both foreign and domestic parties. Affidavits from multiple witnesses, documentation, and expert testimony back up the mathematical and statistical impossibilities of this scheme that happened all across the state of Georgia. The worst occurred in Forsyth, Paulding, Cherokee, Hall, and Barrow Counties. This fraud effects tens of thousands of votes and rigged the election for Biden.
- The fraud begins with Dominion which was recently purchased and rushed into use by Gov. Kemp, SoS Raffensperger, and Georgia Board of Elections.
- Smartmatic and Dominion were founded by foreign bad guys to use computerized ballot-stuffing and vote manipulation to ensure dictator Hugo Chavez never lost another election. (Have a whistleblower affidavit to back up claim.)
- More details on design of Smartmatic software.
- A basic part of the software’s design is its ability to hide the manipulation of votes from attempts at an audit.
- Dominion software functions much the same way. It does not keep track of the date and time stamps of the ballot counts and the logged information is not protected. This lets an unauthorized user add, change, or remove log entries so they do not reflect the actual will of the people.
- Since it is possible to alter the logs, it does not meet standards to be considered for an audit. There is physical evidence that the physical security of the voting machines and the software were breached and that they were connected to the internet which is against professional standards and against state and federal laws.
- Fraud is also clear in the lies and conduct of the Fulton County election workers by delaying voting at State Farm Arena and their reasons for the delay.
- Video from the Arena show on Nov. 3rd after the polls closed, election workers lied about a water leak causing the facility to close. All poll workers and challengers were evacuated for several hours at about 10 p.m., but several election workers stayed behind working at the computers for the voting tabulation machines until after 1 a.m.
- Kemp and Raffensperger rushed through the purchase of Dominion in 2019 for the 2020 election. A certificate from the SoS was awarded to Dominion but it is undated. Also, a test report is signed by Michael Walker as Project Manager but is also undated. (they have both documents)
- Kemp and Raffensperger ignored concerns that caused Texas to reject them in 2018, like vulnerabilities to non-auditable manipulation. (A professional, Dr. Andrew Appel, wrote how to hack such a voting machine with a screwdriver within 7 minutes- they have this study attached)
- Dominion was accessed by agents acting on behalf of China and Iran to monitor and manipulate elections including the most recent US general election in 2020. Eric Coomer is listed on the patent records as the first of the inventors of Dominion. (This is backed up by a former electronic intelligence analyst’s affidavit)
- This intelligence analyst, Navid Keshavarez-Nia, says U.S. intelligence services created systems, including Dominion, to manipulate data in battleground states. He says that hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for Trump in 2020 were transferred to Biden.
- Indisputable records from the Board of Elections show at least 96,600 absentee ballots were requested and counted but were never recorded as turned in by the voter. At the minimum, all of these votes must be discarded (attached affidavit shows proof)
- Dominion makes it impossible to reconcile the number of voters to the number of ballots cast. This was apparent when 3,300 votes were found on memory sticks that were not uploaded election night, and 2,600 absentee ballots in Floyd county had not been scanned. These “found votes” reduced Biden’s lead over Trump. (This allegation is documented and the document is cited)
- Georgia election officials and poll watchers, wittingly or unwittingly, helped Dominion carry out massive voter fraud by refusing to follow legal safeguards for absentee ballots. They didn’t verify signatures or check security envelopes. They prevented challengers from observing the count.
- Expert analysis shows that at least 96,600 votes were illegally counted. All of the evidence and allegations mentioned is more than enough to place the result of this election in doubt. More evidence arrives by the day and discovery should be ordered immediately.
- Georgia law lets the results of an election be contested where: Misconduct, fraud, or irregularities could change or call into doubt the result of the election, when illegal votes are received or legal votes are rejected to such an amount that it could change or call into question the result. If there is any error in counting the votes or declaring the result of the election, or for any other cause that another was the person legally elected.
- All of the above have occurred and the Court is obligated to set aside the 2020 results which fraudulently show Biden as the winner.
- There are also plenty of Constitutional grounds to set aside the election results due to the failure to follow the law in processing and counting absentee ballots which led to the tabulation of more than 50,000 illegal ballots. The Parties
- Plaintiff Coreco Ja’Qan Pearson (a Georgia resident and Elector) wants to decertify the election results.
- Plaintiff Vikki Townsend Consiglio (a registered voter from Georgia and Elector)
- Plaintiff Gloria Kay Godwin (registered voter from Georgia and Elector)
- Plaintiff James Kenneth Carroll (registered voter from Georgia and Elector)
- Plaintiff Carolyn Hall Fisher (registered voter from Georgia and Elector)
- Plaintiff Cathleen Alston Latham (registered voter from Georgia and Elector)
- Plaintiff Jason M. Shepherd (Chairman of Cobb County Republican Party) brings case forward in official capacity on behalf of Cobb County Rep. Party.
- Plaintiff Brian Jay Van Gundy (registered voter in Georgia and Assis. Secretary of Georgia Rep. Party)
- Defendant Governor Brian Kemp is mentioned in his official role as Governor of Georgia. He bought the new Dominion Voting Systems for GA, budgeting $150 million for them despite Democrats fighting it and pointing to experts who warned it would lead to hacking and tampering. (Article proving these assertions cited)
- Defendant Brad Raffensperger is mentioned in his official role as Secretary of State of GA and as Chief Election Official for GA. He is in this lawsuit because he has the responsibility to enforce election laws. (cites laws that prove his responsibilities)
- Defendants Rebecca N. Sullivan, David J. Worley, Matthew Mashburn, and Anh Le: Members of the State Election Board. (cites their responsibilities according to GA law) Jurisdiction and Venue
- This Court has jurisdiction over this case. (cites law)
- This court has jurisdiction over the information in this case as it involves a federal election (cites law)
- More citing of law stating the Court has jurisdiction.
- More citing of law stating the Court has jurisdiction.
- More citing of law stating the Court has jurisdiction.
- According to the Constitution, state legislatures have power over elections and state executive officers like Raffensperger don’t have that power. Statement of Facts
- Plaintiffs are filing this suit because rights and privileges under the Constitution were violated. They also dispute the election results. (cites relevant laws)
- The Constitution explains who has power to regulate elections.
- The Constitution lays out who can and can’t be an Elector.
- Neither Defendent (Kemp,Raffensperger, or Elections Board Members) has the power to change laws and have to abide by the laws (cites laws)
- While the Elections Clause does not diminish a State’s ability to determine its own lawmaking process, it does hold states accountable to their chosen processes. (cites laws)
- Plaintiffs call this election result into contest because it shows all the signs of having been fraudulent according to GA law (cites law)
- Cites law on how Presidential Electors are elected.
- The GA Legislature said to follow the laws already in existence about how to handle absentee ballots.(cites GA law)
- Lists steps meant to be taken to count absentee ballots and emphasizes that according to law the registrar or clerk will need to write the day and hour of receipt of the ballot on the envelope, then compare the identifying information on the ballot with the information on file, and if everything looks correct, will need to sign or initial below the voter’s oath.
- Points out that GA law also explains what to do if the registrar or clerk have failed to sign on the outside of the envelope or that the signature does not match the signature on file at the registrar or clerk’s office.
- Emphasizes the following in GA law: If the elector has failed to sign the oath, or if the signature does not appear to be valid, or information given does not match that on file with the registrar or clerk’s office, the ballot will be rejected and the elector will be notified of the rejection and a copy of the notification will be kept on file for at least one year.
