川普新採訪: 本來可以很輕鬆說服俄羅斯不打的
週五Fox News對川普的採訪:
Trump sounds off on Zelenskyy amid feud over peace talks: 'I've had it'
打給懶得看視頻的同學:
Trump: …just so you know when you say Russia is the attacker, yes Russia attacked, but there was no reason for them to attack, you could have talked them out of it. There was no reason he was going in, it should have never happened. Every time I say, 'Oh, it's not Russia's fault,' I always get slammed by the fake news. But I'm telling you. Biden said the wrong things. Zelenskyy said the wrong things.
…
….Russia could have been talked out of that so easily that never should have been a war….
….
so when Zelensky said he was not invited to the meeting…it wasn’t a priority because he did such a bad job in negotiating so far. Number one you shouldn’t have had a war. And if you did it should have been solved and settled immediately….
所以還是怪拜登和澤連司機的嘴炮能力太差不足以忽悠俄羅斯⋯⋯
聽到現在我是真的好奇這位天選之子覺得可以靠什麼忽悠成功俄羅斯不打這個仗,聽上去彷彿點根煙的事。
(另外關於稀土的交易,川普說觀察了很久發現澤連斯基談判時沒有任何籌碼,他已經受夠了。誰知道稀土值多少錢,但至少它還有點價值。)
Trump sounds off on Zelenskyy amid feud over peace talks: 'I've had it'
打給懶得看視頻的同學:
Trump: …just so you know when you say Russia is the attacker, yes Russia attacked, but there was no reason for them to attack, you could have talked them out of it. There was no reason he was going in, it should have never happened. Every time I say, 'Oh, it's not Russia's fault,' I always get slammed by the fake news. But I'm telling you. Biden said the wrong things. Zelenskyy said the wrong things.
…
….Russia could have been talked out of that so easily that never should have been a war….
….
so when Zelensky said he was not invited to the meeting…it wasn’t a priority because he did such a bad job in negotiating so far. Number one you shouldn’t have had a war. And if you did it should have been solved and settled immediately….
所以還是怪拜登和澤連司機的嘴炮能力太差不足以忽悠俄羅斯⋯⋯
聽到現在我是真的好奇這位天選之子覺得可以靠什麼忽悠成功俄羅斯不打這個仗,聽上去彷彿點根煙的事。
(另外關於稀土的交易,川普說觀察了很久發現澤連斯基談判時沒有任何籌碼,他已經受夠了。誰知道稀土值多少錢,但至少它還有點價值。)
34 个评论
>> 就算是美国总统现在也就撑死也就50多一点的支持率在...美国这种半民主制度,根本无法阻止骗子的上台。…
網絡這麽發達,如果不讀書,還是只能瞭解殘缺不全的碎片信息,如果你潛縮在中文網,那就只能看一些陰謀論,你列舉的那些所謂你認爲的政治的本質:美國半民主,不如台灣,所以只能選出騙子,有一半的美國人反對川普… 不過就是網絡碎片信息加中文世界常見的蠢貨結論。
川普一半的支持率就是半民主,那百分之百的支持率才是全(過程)民主的勝利… 美國人選總統,不是選英明領袖好吧,他們自身的利益出發點是最大考量好吧。
所以支那人討論美國總統經常是很奇怪的事情,你的利益出發點在哪裏,或者說,管你屁事。