【大选相关请发至讨论专版】2020美国大选开票、直播、集中讨论串

川普有关消毒剂的言论是被断章取义的，我并不是说他发表这种言论就可以不负责。事实上川普很多言论确实像是没经过大脑说出来的。但是左媒对这件事的传播和解读，意图也并非是“澄清消毒剂的使用方式”而是“川普说了要注射消毒剂”。

Bryan responded, “No, I’m here to talk about the findings that we had in the study.  We won’t do that within that lab and our lab.”

Trump also seemed to backtrack on the use of the word “injection.”

“It wouldn’t be through injection,” Trump said. “We’re talking about through almost a cleaning, sterilization of an area.  Maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t work.  But it certainly has a big effect if it’s on a stationary object.”

Even so, even in those later remarks, Trump still was advancing the idea of a “cleaning, sterilization of an area,” even if it is not entirely clear whether he meant internally or externally.

尽管川普做了否认，但是左媒依旧对这种言论进行传播和具有倾向性的解读。
川普说话是不是不走脑子？是。他说错话也不是一次两次了。问题在于很多人谈及川普的口误时马上唾沫横飞，口无遮拦。说到拜登邮件门马上闭口不谈，变成谦谦君子。这是中立吗？这是理性客观吗？大选现在出现了问题，不管最终是否能搜到能一锤定音的证据，是不是也应该彻查投票程序？难道面对问题不去解决，直接让权就是所谓的“文明”？
可能在某些人心目中，不管选举过程是如何的，只要最后是川普输了，那就必须文明让权才符合他们心中的君子形象，接着扣一个“品葱人都崇拜川普”的帽子，倒是容易得很。反正最后退圈就行了，反正都是平台的错。