待FC James Lyons-Weiler博士讨论冠狀病毒为人工合成? 是否实锤？
https://youtu.be/DwpAY2EPVFk
[url=https://m.youtube.com/results?search_query=%232019nCoV]
[/url][url=https://m.youtube.com/results?search_query=%23Coronavirus][/url]
James Lyons-Weiler博士 1/30/2020討論武漢2019年nCoV冠狀病毒为人工合成
[url=https://m.youtube.com/results?search_query=%232019nCoV]
[/url][url=https://m.youtube.com/results?search_query=%23Coronavirus][/url]
James Lyons-Weiler博士 1/30/2020討論武漢2019年nCoV冠狀病毒为人工合成
不是，他本人已在2月9日更新說可以排除人工合成，但不能排除實驗室洩漏
https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2020/02/02/moderately-strong-confirmation-of-a-laboratory-origin-of-2019-ncov/
其他學者對他的質疑主要在於他所謂的人工合成片段與相關的病毒DNA片段只有67%，比其他冠狀病毒的相似度要低得多
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/2019-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov-does-not-contain-pshuttle-sn-sequence-no-evidence-that-virus-is-man-made/
https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2020/02/02/moderately-strong-confirmation-of-a-laboratory-origin-of-2019-ncov/
GIVEN THAT WE HAVE FOUND THIS SIGNATURE, A FUNCTIONAL MOTIF FINGERPRINT, PRESENT IN THE HK-3 CoV FROM 2005, WE BELIEVE THIS EXONERATES RECOMBINATION IN THE LAB AS A SOURCE OF THE VIRUS. THIS DOES NOT EXONERATE ACCIDENTAL RELEASE, HOWEVER.
其他學者對他的質疑主要在於他所謂的人工合成片段與相關的病毒DNA片段只有67%，比其他冠狀病毒的相似度要低得多
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/2019-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov-does-not-contain-pshuttle-sn-sequence-no-evidence-that-virus-is-man-made/
Experts who examined Lyons-Weiler’s hypothesis found it to be scientifically unsound. Aaron Irving, a virologist and senior research fellow at Duke-NUS Medical School, pointed out that the similarity between INS1378 and pShuttle-SN is actually low, with only a 67% match between the DNA sequences. Lyons-Weiler acknowledged this finding in his article, but InfoWars and other outlets did not.
In fact, conducting a multiple sequence alignment of INS1378 against all sequences in the National Center for Biotechnology Information databasedemonstrates that INS1378 has a much higher similarity to bat coronaviruses than to pShuttle-SN, which does not even appear in the list of 100 closest matches.
