美国会C19病毒起源听证会重要片段
https://twitter.com/VigilantFox/status/1633491748893728768?s=20
Former CDC Director: "There's No Doubt That NIH Funded Gain-of-Function Research"
Ms. Malliotakis: "Is it likely that American tax dollars funded the gain-of-function research that created this virus?"
Dr. Redfield: "I think it did — not only from NIH but from the State Department, USAID, and from DOD."
这让太多人情何以堪....
Former CDC Director: "There's No Doubt That NIH Funded Gain-of-Function Research"
Ms. Malliotakis: "Is it likely that American tax dollars funded the gain-of-function research that created this virus?"
Dr. Redfield: "I think it did — not only from NIH but from the State Department, USAID, and from DOD."
这让太多人情何以堪....
9 个评论
你球一大半災難是你支搞出來的 剩下的就是你美爹或者美支合力搞出來的
別說Chinese virus
就算concentration camp有份也不意外
你蔥一半人住美國 另一半人跪舔美國
有事沒事找點民主燈塔來跪拜希望別人白給民主 不然就是瞎吹
看看隔壁太君投完國會議員票回家順路參拜靖國神社感激當年爺爺昭和老英雄的英明決定
別說Chinese virus
就算concentration camp有份也不意外
你蔥一半人住美國 另一半人跪舔美國
有事沒事找點民主燈塔來跪拜希望別人白給民主 不然就是瞎吹
看看隔壁太君投完國會議員票回家順路參拜靖國神社感激當年爺爺昭和老英雄的英明決定
早就猜到废气和武毒有染了，不过一个前cdc说的其他部门，这是否有点，，，
>>早就猜到废气和武毒有染了，不过一个前cdc说的其他部门，这是否有点，，，
这事情水很深，可以听听推特伤关于Sasha的挖掘，辉瑞和国防部的合同。如果搞明白了，会很惊人。但是品葱伤大部分人还远没到可以接受的程度，连听证会这种宣了誓的证据都接受不了还别说其他的了。不过没关系，事情会浮出水面的。
>>这事情水很深，可以听听推特伤关于Sasha的挖掘，辉瑞和国防部的合同。如果搞明白了，会很惊人。但是品...
有联系是肯定的，问题是最终的实验室管理不善和其他原因查清楚没有，高风险的病毒好像本来也就是发达国家才能妥善保管的，这中间有没有利益输送这些的是重点，不过sasha不会是七哥那个吧？要看直接看听证会视频就行了，结合你历史动态，味有点冲，支黑还是五毛尚不得知，我倾向后者 🤣
>>这事情水很深，可以听听推特伤关于Sasha的挖掘，辉瑞和国防部的合同。如果搞明白了，会很惊人。但是品...那个时候还研究埃博拉也有次差点搞泄露来着
已隐藏
美国制度的强大在于这种自揭伤疤的行为。美国各界精英和中共勾兑的事实迟早要被曝光和纠正。
这不是美帝整自己么？说好了整中国的呢？
这是完整报道
这位CDC前领导很早认为病毒起源于实验室(中国那个)
美国的功能增强技术非常可能被中国用来产生了这种病毒
美国的政府投资非常有可能被武汉病毒所用来进行了相关研究
这样总结一下颠覆党国效果是不是好一些?
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64891745
这位CDC前领导很早认为病毒起源于实验室(中国那个)
美国的功能增强技术非常可能被中国用来产生了这种病毒
美国的政府投资非常有可能被武汉病毒所用来进行了相关研究
这样总结一下颠覆党国效果是不是好一些?
Dr Redfield, who led the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention when the outbreak began in 2020, was an early proponent of the lab leak theory.
He told the House select subcommittee, formed by the new Republican majority in the US House of Representatives, it was "not scientifically plausible" to him that the virus had natural origins.
He claimed he was "sidelined" at the beginning of the pandemic and excluded from meetings as his views were not in line with other major scientists like Dr Anthony Fauci, the de-facto face of the US pandemic response.
"It was told to me that they wanted a single narrative, and that I obviously had a different point of view," he said. "Science has debate and they squashed any debate."
Dr Redfield also spoke of his opposition to so-called gain of function research, in which viruses are manipulated to become more infectious in lab environments.
He said that US agencies had likely funded such research at the Wuhan institute.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64891745