美國將推「S.686限制法案」 VPN翻牆最重恐關20年
https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E5%8C%96-%E7%BE%8E%E5%9C%8B%E6%9C%83%E5%B0%87%E6%8E%A8-686%E9%99%90%E5%88%B6%E6%B3%95%E6%A1%88-vpn%E7%BF%BB%E7%89%86%E6%9C%80%E9%87%8D%E6%81%90%E9%97%9C20%E5%B9%B4-011946474.html
美國國會近期正在推動最初被稱為「抖音法案」（TikTok Biil）的《S.686限制法案》（S.686 Restriction Act），近期引發熱烈討論，因為若法案通過，使用VPN翻牆的民眾，最重將面臨最重100萬美元（約新台幣3052萬元）的罰款或被關20年。
據《BeInCrypto》報導，美國兩黨共同提出的S.686限制法案，最初被稱為抖音法案，但它可能用更廣泛的影響，因VPN用戶最重將面臨最重100萬美元（約新台幣3052萬元）的罰款或20年監禁。
據了解，人們常合法使用VPN（虛擬專用網絡），來為網路通信增加安全，用戶們還可以用VPN來遮蔽或更改用戶網址，通常用在訪問可能被阻止或審查的內容，而用戶可能用VPN瀏覽TikTok等被禁止的網站。
據報導，上週美國當局對TikTok執行長周壽子的質詢。眾議院議長麥卡錫說，眾議院將推動該法案。如果法案真的通過，新立法會對授予美國政府廣泛的權力，來打擊它認為的任何威脅技術和服務。反對者說，這是美國中國化。
據《Responsible Statecraft》報導，TikTok在美國擁有1.5億名用戶，現在官員們急於禁止這款由北京字節跳動的應用程式，該法案對敏感個人訊息的定義很廣泛，如果有一家中國擁有部分所有權的公司，轉發電子郵件或健康保險訊息，都可能會被禁止金融交易或凍結財產。報導稱，應該有更簡單的方法來阻止中國政府蒐集TikTok的私人用戶數據，但對於希望擴大國家權力的人來說，卻不是如此。
美國國會近期正在推動最初被稱為「抖音法案」（TikTok Biil）的《S.686限制法案》（S.686 Restriction Act），近期引發熱烈討論，因為若法案通過，使用VPN翻牆的民眾，最重將面臨最重100萬美元（約新台幣3052萬元）的罰款或被關20年。
據《BeInCrypto》報導，美國兩黨共同提出的S.686限制法案，最初被稱為抖音法案，但它可能用更廣泛的影響，因VPN用戶最重將面臨最重100萬美元（約新台幣3052萬元）的罰款或20年監禁。
據了解，人們常合法使用VPN（虛擬專用網絡），來為網路通信增加安全，用戶們還可以用VPN來遮蔽或更改用戶網址，通常用在訪問可能被阻止或審查的內容，而用戶可能用VPN瀏覽TikTok等被禁止的網站。
據報導，上週美國當局對TikTok執行長周壽子的質詢。眾議院議長麥卡錫說，眾議院將推動該法案。如果法案真的通過，新立法會對授予美國政府廣泛的權力，來打擊它認為的任何威脅技術和服務。反對者說，這是美國中國化。
據《Responsible Statecraft》報導，TikTok在美國擁有1.5億名用戶，現在官員們急於禁止這款由北京字節跳動的應用程式，該法案對敏感個人訊息的定義很廣泛，如果有一家中國擁有部分所有權的公司，轉發電子郵件或健康保險訊息，都可能會被禁止金融交易或凍結財產。報導稱，應該有更簡單的方法來阻止中國政府蒐集TikTok的私人用戶數據，但對於希望擴大國家權力的人來說，卻不是如此。
9 个评论
晶哥演得太差了，你这种业务水平拿不到绩效的
BeInCrypto
Responsible Statecraft
....
全身扯淡的新闻来源
Responsible Statecraft
....
全身扯淡的新闻来源
是威尔逊爱德华兹议员起草的吗
这里是vice的报道https://www.vice.com/en/article/4a3ddb/restrict-act-insanely-broad-ban-tiktok-vpns
禁TikTok初衷是好的，但是看法案内容，国会似乎是在借TikTok的东风打造美国版GFW。该法案的目前版本的主要问题有以下几个
1、缺乏监督。商务部可以禁止一切来自于国外竞争对手的技术，这样的法案现在可以用来禁止TikTok，未来也可以用来禁止telegram，不受民众监督。而核心问题，保护用户数据安全，该法案则完全没有涉及到。
Under the RESTRICT Act, the Department of Commerce would identify information and communications technology products that a foreign adversary has any interest in, or poses an unacceptable risk to national security, the announcement reads. The bill only applies to technology linked to a “foreign adversary.” Those countries include China (as well as Hong Kong); Cuba; Iran; North Korea; Russia, and Venezuela.
2、语言模糊，这个法案能做到的远远超过了禁TikTok，未来一切的来自中国的软件都可能被禁止。
The bill’s language includes vague terms such as “desktop applications,” “mobile applications,” “gaming applications,” “payment applications,” and “web-based applications.” It also targets applicable software that has more than 1 million users in the U.S.
3、使用VPN连接TikTok将入罪，
情况严重者，比如干涉美国选举，危害美国国家安全，颠覆政府，最长入狱20年罚金100万美元。比如哪天美国认为虚拟货币危害到美国金融安全，也可以引用该法对比特币交易和持有进行处罚。
VPNs protect users online by running their activity through a server in a different location and changing their online signature in the process, sometimes allowing users to bypass local restrictions. VPNs are entirely legal in the United States, but some users claim that the use of the VPN could be considered criminal under the terms of the RESTRICT Act if it was used to access the Chinese or Russian internet.
The Restrict Act is INSANE," crypto investor Jesse Eckel tweeted. "20 years in prison for using a VPN. The ability for them to target essentially anything they deem a 'risk.' Seizure of property and digital assets. Could’ve simply banned Tiktok, but instead they go full villain on us."
Cohen said that someone would need to be in "sabotage or subversion" of American technology, causing "catastrophic effects" or "interfering in, or altering the result" with a federal election to be held liable under the proposed legislation.
4、危害言论自由。依据该法，所有有境外关系的通讯软件都有可能被禁止，这将危害美国人民的言论自由。
“The RESTRICT Act could lead to apps and other ICT services with connections to certain foreign countries being banned in the United States. Any bill that would allow the US government to ban an online service that facilitates Americans' speech raises serious First Amendment concerns,” Caitlin Vogus, deputy director of the Center for Democracy & Technology’s Free Expression Project, told Motherboard in an emailed statement. “In addition, while bills like the RESTRICT Act may be motivated by legitimate privacy concerns, banning ICT services with connections to foreign countries would not necessarily help protect Americans' privacy. Those countries may still obtain data through other means, like by purchasing it from private data brokers.”
禁TikTok初衷是好的，但是看法案内容，国会似乎是在借TikTok的东风打造美国版GFW。该法案的目前版本的主要问题有以下几个
1、缺乏监督。商务部可以禁止一切来自于国外竞争对手的技术，这样的法案现在可以用来禁止TikTok，未来也可以用来禁止telegram，不受民众监督。而核心问题，保护用户数据安全，该法案则完全没有涉及到。
Under the RESTRICT Act, the Department of Commerce would identify information and communications technology products that a foreign adversary has any interest in, or poses an unacceptable risk to national security, the announcement reads. The bill only applies to technology linked to a “foreign adversary.” Those countries include China (as well as Hong Kong); Cuba; Iran; North Korea; Russia, and Venezuela.
2、语言模糊，这个法案能做到的远远超过了禁TikTok，未来一切的来自中国的软件都可能被禁止。
The bill’s language includes vague terms such as “desktop applications,” “mobile applications,” “gaming applications,” “payment applications,” and “web-based applications.” It also targets applicable software that has more than 1 million users in the U.S.
3、使用VPN连接TikTok将入罪，
情况严重者，比如干涉美国选举，危害美国国家安全，颠覆政府，最长入狱20年罚金100万美元。比如哪天美国认为虚拟货币危害到美国金融安全，也可以引用该法对比特币交易和持有进行处罚。
VPNs protect users online by running their activity through a server in a different location and changing their online signature in the process, sometimes allowing users to bypass local restrictions. VPNs are entirely legal in the United States, but some users claim that the use of the VPN could be considered criminal under the terms of the RESTRICT Act if it was used to access the Chinese or Russian internet.
The Restrict Act is INSANE," crypto investor Jesse Eckel tweeted. "20 years in prison for using a VPN. The ability for them to target essentially anything they deem a 'risk.' Seizure of property and digital assets. Could’ve simply banned Tiktok, but instead they go full villain on us."
Cohen said that someone would need to be in "sabotage or subversion" of American technology, causing "catastrophic effects" or "interfering in, or altering the result" with a federal election to be held liable under the proposed legislation.
4、危害言论自由。依据该法，所有有境外关系的通讯软件都有可能被禁止，这将危害美国人民的言论自由。
“The RESTRICT Act could lead to apps and other ICT services with connections to certain foreign countries being banned in the United States. Any bill that would allow the US government to ban an online service that facilitates Americans' speech raises serious First Amendment concerns,” Caitlin Vogus, deputy director of the Center for Democracy & Technology’s Free Expression Project, told Motherboard in an emailed statement. “In addition, while bills like the RESTRICT Act may be motivated by legitimate privacy concerns, banning ICT services with connections to foreign countries would not necessarily help protect Americans' privacy. Those countries may still obtain data through other means, like by purchasing it from private data brokers.”
除非你是加拿大，否則還沒敲定呢。美國又不像中國，擬定就幾乎一定能通過，急什麼？說不定等下就被打槍了
如果你真是加拿大，那這個川普借你，早點想辦法讓美國出錢造牆吧
如果你真是加拿大，那這個川普借你，早點想辦法讓美國出錢造牆吧
另外在Reddit上看到关于此事的讨论，讲实话不是很多，搜出了的都是几天前的讨论，但是有网友反映自己在FB上的帖子被限流了（能发出去，好友notification上没有更新和推送）。
以下是vice的报道链接：
https://www.vice.com/en/article/4a3ddb/restrict-act-insanely-broad-ban-tiktok-vpns
禁TikTok初衷是好的，但是看法案内容，国会似乎是在借TikTok的东风打造美国版GFW。该法案的目前版本的主要问题有以下几个
1、缺乏监督。商务部可以禁止一切来自于国外竞争对手的技术，这样的法案现在可以用来禁止TikTok，未来也可以用来禁止telegram，不受民众监督。而核心问题，保护用户数据安全，该法案则完全没有涉及到。
Under the RESTRICT Act, the Department of Commerce would identify information and communications technology products that a foreign adversary has any interest in, or poses an unacceptable risk to national security, the announcement reads. The bill only applies to technology linked to a “foreign adversary.” Those countries include China (as well as Hong Kong); Cuba; Iran; North Korea; Russia, and Venezuela.
2、语言模糊，这个法案能做到的远远超过了禁TikTok，未来一切的来自中国的软件都可能被禁止。
The bill’s language includes vague terms such as “desktop applications,” “mobile applications,” “gaming applications,” “payment applications,” and “web-based applications.” It also targets applicable software that has more than 1 million users in the U.S.
3、使用VPN连接TikTok将入罪，
情况严重者，比如干涉美国选举，危害美国国家安全，颠覆政府，最长入狱20年罚金100万美元。比如哪天美国认为虚拟货币危害到美国金融安全，也可以引用该法对比特币交易和持有进行处罚。
VPNs protect users online by running their activity through a server in a different location and changing their online signature in the process, sometimes allowing users to bypass local restrictions. VPNs are entirely legal in the United States, but some users claim that the use of the VPN could be considered criminal under the terms of the RESTRICT Act if it was used to access the Chinese or Russian internet.
The Restrict Act is INSANE," crypto investor Jesse Eckel tweeted. "20 years in prison for using a VPN. The ability for them to target essentially anything they deem a 'risk.' Seizure of property and digital assets. Could’ve simply banned Tiktok, but instead they go full villain on us."
Cohen said that someone would need to be in "sabotage or subversion" of American technology, causing "catastrophic effects" or "interfering in, or altering the result" with a federal election to be held liable under the proposed legislation.
4、危害言论自由。依据该法，所有有境外关系的通讯软件都有可能被禁止，这将危害美国人民的言论自由。
“The RESTRICT Act could lead to apps and other ICT services with connections to certain foreign countries being banned in the United States. Any bill that would allow the US government to ban an online service that facilitates Americans' speech raises serious First Amendment concerns,” Caitlin Vogus, deputy director of the Center for Democracy & Technology’s Free Expression Project, told Motherboard in an emailed statement. “In addition, while bills like the RESTRICT Act may be motivated by legitimate privacy concerns, banning ICT services with connections to foreign countries would not necessarily help protect Americans' privacy. Those countries may still obtain data through other means, like by purchasing it from private data brokers.”
以下是vice的报道链接：
https://www.vice.com/en/article/4a3ddb/restrict-act-insanely-broad-ban-tiktok-vpns
禁TikTok初衷是好的，但是看法案内容，国会似乎是在借TikTok的东风打造美国版GFW。该法案的目前版本的主要问题有以下几个
1、缺乏监督。商务部可以禁止一切来自于国外竞争对手的技术，这样的法案现在可以用来禁止TikTok，未来也可以用来禁止telegram，不受民众监督。而核心问题，保护用户数据安全，该法案则完全没有涉及到。
Under the RESTRICT Act, the Department of Commerce would identify information and communications technology products that a foreign adversary has any interest in, or poses an unacceptable risk to national security, the announcement reads. The bill only applies to technology linked to a “foreign adversary.” Those countries include China (as well as Hong Kong); Cuba; Iran; North Korea; Russia, and Venezuela.
2、语言模糊，这个法案能做到的远远超过了禁TikTok，未来一切的来自中国的软件都可能被禁止。
The bill’s language includes vague terms such as “desktop applications,” “mobile applications,” “gaming applications,” “payment applications,” and “web-based applications.” It also targets applicable software that has more than 1 million users in the U.S.
3、使用VPN连接TikTok将入罪，
情况严重者，比如干涉美国选举，危害美国国家安全，颠覆政府，最长入狱20年罚金100万美元。比如哪天美国认为虚拟货币危害到美国金融安全，也可以引用该法对比特币交易和持有进行处罚。
VPNs protect users online by running their activity through a server in a different location and changing their online signature in the process, sometimes allowing users to bypass local restrictions. VPNs are entirely legal in the United States, but some users claim that the use of the VPN could be considered criminal under the terms of the RESTRICT Act if it was used to access the Chinese or Russian internet.
The Restrict Act is INSANE," crypto investor Jesse Eckel tweeted. "20 years in prison for using a VPN. The ability for them to target essentially anything they deem a 'risk.' Seizure of property and digital assets. Could’ve simply banned Tiktok, but instead they go full villain on us."
Cohen said that someone would need to be in "sabotage or subversion" of American technology, causing "catastrophic effects" or "interfering in, or altering the result" with a federal election to be held liable under the proposed legislation.
4、危害言论自由。依据该法，所有有境外关系的通讯软件都有可能被禁止，这将危害美国人民的言论自由。
“The RESTRICT Act could lead to apps and other ICT services with connections to certain foreign countries being banned in the United States. Any bill that would allow the US government to ban an online service that facilitates Americans' speech raises serious First Amendment concerns,” Caitlin Vogus, deputy director of the Center for Democracy & Technology’s Free Expression Project, told Motherboard in an emailed statement. “In addition, while bills like the RESTRICT Act may be motivated by legitimate privacy concerns, banning ICT services with connections to foreign countries would not necessarily help protect Americans' privacy. Those countries may still obtain data through other means, like by purchasing it from private data brokers.”
支持楼主发表意见，反对楼主立场。
建墙的是中国，利用墙来危害美国企业利益的也是中国。美国采取对等制裁天经地义，华裔不怪中国封锁WhatsApp，却怪美国封锁微信，没有任何道理。而且总有Skype之类舔共的产品可以使用，实在不行，也可以打电话嘛。
建墙的是中国，利用墙来危害美国企业利益的也是中国。美国采取对等制裁天经地义，华裔不怪中国封锁WhatsApp，却怪美国封锁微信，没有任何道理。而且总有Skype之类舔共的产品可以使用，实在不行，也可以打电话嘛。
美国已经沦为要和中国比较正当化自己的动机了吗？ 中国不尊重言论自由，美国也可以么？要等屠龙者终变恶龙才后知后觉吗？再者，我不反对禁止抖音（虽然我也不支持），但是我反对没有监督的损害言论的立法(red scare)。我知道品葱的政治倾向，我也不知道你是不是人在美国，关不关心这个问题，但是我可以很明确地说这个法是恶法(类比patriot act)，我会在各种平台上发声去反对，也会给我的国会议员写邮件打电话的。
>>支持楼主发表意见，反对楼主立场。建墙的是中国，利用墙来危害美国企业利益的也是中国。美国采取对等制裁天...
另外你可以去看一下法案的原文，就知道有多夸张了，比如法案的时间范围
(D) TIMING.—The term “covered transaction” includes a current, past, or potential future transaction.
什么叫potential future transaction，我怀疑你有这个动机就够了么？
再者CCP再不尊重言论自由，翻个墙能判多少年？1年，5年还是15天？
我知道品葱站务不喜欢黑美国的帖子，但是美国也是有黑点的。我相信你们也不想千里迢迢逃出中国发现美国也是一样的垃圾吧？如果你们不想这种情况发生，请允许批评美国的声音，不要合并主题，间接降流。
(D) TIMING.—The term “covered transaction” includes a current, past, or potential future transaction.
什么叫potential future transaction，我怀疑你有这个动机就够了么？
再者CCP再不尊重言论自由，翻个墙能判多少年？1年，5年还是15天？
我知道品葱站务不喜欢黑美国的帖子，但是美国也是有黑点的。我相信你们也不想千里迢迢逃出中国发现美国也是一样的垃圾吧？如果你们不想这种情况发生，请允许批评美国的声音，不要合并主题，间接降流。
>>支持楼主发表意见，反对楼主立场。建墙的是中国，利用墙来危害美国企业利益的也是中国。美国采取对等制裁天...