西方著名的哲学家、历史学家、政治学家对支国有过哪些深刻准确而乳汁的评价??

例如
托克维尔:中国人有安宁而无幸福,有百业而无进步,有稳劲儿而无闯劲儿,有严苛的制度而无公共的品德

黑格尔:中国历史从本质上看是没有历史的,它只是君主覆灭的一再重复而已。任何进步都不可能从中产生。几千年的中国,其实是一个大赌场,恶棍们轮流坐庄,混蛋们换班执政,炮灰们总是做祭品,这才是中国历史的本来面目。事实上,中国任何一次革命都没能使这个国家取得尺寸的进步。
feefee 百越各民族要擺脫中國殖民者獨立
有很多,曾德昭只是开始,我准备写一个系列,敬请等待。

明代来华葡萄牙传教士曾德昭,在著作《大中国志》中对中国人欺骗手段的描述
江泽之民 你必须跳下悬崖,在坠落中生出翅膀
中国的历史从本质上看是没有历史的,它只是君主覆灭的一再重复而已。任何进步都不可能从中产生。
 ——黑格尔《法哲学原理》

网友评论:黑格尔说中国没有历史,其实是有道理的,因为中国历史在他看来,为什么称不上是历史,是因为“几千年的中国,其实是一个大赌场,恶棍们轮流坐庄,混蛋们换班执政,炮灰们总是做祭品,这才是中国历史的本来面目。事实上,中国任何一次革命都没能使这个历史改变。

“人民却把自己看作是最卑贱的,自信生下来是专门给皇帝拉车的。逼他们掉到水深火热中去的生活的担子,他们看作是不可避免的命运,就是卖身为奴,吃口奴隶的苦钣,他们也不以为可怕。”

“在中国,皇帝就是家长。法律与道德不分,唯一意志就是皇帝意志。”

“历史从中国谈起,可中国停留在世界历史之外。”

“中国政府完全建立在家庭的伦理关系上。皇帝像父亲一样,掌管一切。百姓像儿子尽孝道。一切都得服从。在中国,家庭的义务具有绝对的约束力。各种义务都是由下而上,却没有从上往下的。”

在这种家长制的国家里,臣民都是些未成年的孩子。中国属于幼年文化,人的精神无法独立,更谈不上自由,他们像孩子那样一味服从,依赖父母。而皇帝是他们的绝对家长。”

“残酷的体罚,随时随地发生。父亲对儿子,皇帝对大臣,官吏对百姓,上级对下级。”

“中国人没有荣誉感,自卑。所以导致道德败坏,欺诈成风。”

“真正的信仰自由,在个体本身完全不依赖外在动力的地方才有存在的可能。在中国,个体没有这种独立性特征。中国只有迷信,没有真正意义上的宗教。”

“孔子的著作里,虽然可以找到正确的道德格言,但是其中不乏兜圈子、反思和回旋。”

“他们自称比欧洲人先发明了火药,可是耶稣会教徒不得不给他们浇铸第一批火炮。”
爱因斯坦旅游日记里的中国篇。



亚当斯密国富论里谈中国体制部分。



搞这个实际上用处不大,中共只会封你,又不会封爱因斯坦亚当斯密,倒时候说你是造谣,爱因斯坦说了也等于没说。
The Rising Tide of Color
Lothrop Stoddard 1920 写的书,卓识远见。节选:

Even a decade ago Professor Ross wrote of industrial conditions there:“Assuredly the cheapness of Chinese labor is something to make a factory owner’s mouth water...Speaking broadly, in any part of the empire, willing laborers of fair intelligence may be had in any number at from eight to fifteen cents a day. With an ocean of such labor power to draw on, China would appear to be on the eve of a manufacturing development that will act like a continental upheaval in changing the trade map of the world.”

Many observers predict that most of these lands will ultimately become Chinese. Says Alleyne Ireland, a recognized authority on these regions: “There is every reason to suppose that, throughout  the tropics, possibly excepting India, the Chinaman, even though he should continue to emigrate in no greater force than hitherto, will gradually supersede all the native races...For the Chinaman, Siberia would do very well. He would breed amazingly there and would fill up the whole country in a remarkably short space of time."

Pearson visualizes a China “become an aggressive military power, sending out her armies in millions to cross the Himalayas and traverse the Steppes, or occupying the islands and the northern parts of Australia, by pouring in immigrants protected by fleets.

Granted that the Chinese will never become the fighting equals of the world’s warrior races, their incredible numbers combined with their tenacious vitality might overcome opponents individually their superiors. Says Professor Ross: “To the West the toughness of the Chinese physique may have a sinister military significance. Nobody fears lest in a stand-up fight Chinese troops could whip an equal number of well-conditioned white troops. But few battles are fought by men fresh from tent and mess. In the course of a prolonged campaign involving irregular provisioning, bad drinking-water, lying out, loss of sleep, exhausting marches, exposure, excitement, and anxiety, it may be that the white soldiers would be worn down worse than the yellow soldiers. In that case the hardier men with less of the martial spirit might in the closing grapple beat the better fighters with the less endurance.”

And another French observer, René Pinon, as far back as 1905, found the primary school children of Kiang-Su province chanting the following lines: “I pray that the frontiers of my country become hard as bronze; that it surpass Europe and America; that it subjugate Japan; that its land and sea armies cover themselves with resplendent glory; that over the whole earth float the Dragon Standard; that the universal mastery of the empire extend and progress. May our empire, like a sleeping tiger suddenly awakened, spring roaring into the arena of combats.”
四邑漁農牧工商總會 观察 已永久退蔥,後會無期,莫聯繫,莫回覆,莫邀答
其它不說,晚清以來各項革命基本是越革越差,北洋革了滿清,氓國革了北洋,支共革了氓國,越來越差
恶臭你支的支识分子就别给自己脸上贴金勒

真正文明人的一贯做法当然是

直接无视,

世界史直接跳过桂枝

桂枝属于动物世界 
so47009 左派自由意志主义者
高馬可(半西半中的一個人)--「香港沒有獲得獨立,而是交還了一個遠比統治此地多年的政府更專制的政府。這個政府之專制,在1989年北京天安門廣場的事件中表露無遺……大多數香港人寧願接受英國的殖民統治,而不想被中國統治。
巴比伦花园 灰名单 追求平等,博爱,客观
爱因斯坦日记啊。。而且他去的是上海,对中国社会和中国人评价非常差,
惡魔信徒馬大胡子的亞細亞方程式算不算?

字字數不足二十,要寫一些東西
fb_china_today https://pincong.rocks/topic/反中国梦系列
罗素 中国问题 

https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Problem_of_China.html

”对中国我有两个担心:(第一个自己去看),第二个是变成日本那样的军国主义国家…”
不需要指名道姓
其实任何一个唯心主义哲学家的论调都和支国的民风截然相反

要发言请先登录注册