【站务】投诉集中帖讨论专板
投诉集中帖现计划仅记录投诉内容,为加快管理员处理速度,不开放讨论功能,所有回复将会转入本帖。本帖会定期清空以方便用户讨论。历史记录请到回收站查看。
历史记录
2019-11-22至2019-12-15
29567 个评论
>>我知道ta是什么样的人所以我拉黑了ta,然后看到你和ta对线看到了过去的我。ta就是诡辩,不是为了真...That is a good call.
Little Pinkies are but a subset of Chinazis that are more subservient to the status quo and less resolute. They are the ones we can easily identify as CCP minions and/or Xi sycophants, and their accounts get busted on Pincong like flies.
There are two other subsets of Chinazis: Maoist Fundamentalists and Democratic Reformists. Despite their diametrical differences in ideology, both are more skillful at demagogy, dedicated to Chinese dominance, and relentless in justifying their ambition through political discourses.
Unfortunately, those two subsets are given a perfect platform to sharpen their skills and polish their speeches here at Pincong, intentionally or inadvertently, simply because they dissent from the CCP status quo and despise Little Pinkies.
Through all the valuable and in-depth discussions on Pincong since its beginning, we should have had an intellectual accord that the current CCP is but one of many products of Chinazi. Just because Maoists and Reformists within Chinazis are censored by the CCP, it does not mean that they should be given an equal platform where they can crowd out, demoralize, and play victim against those who are truly silenced, threatened, oppressed, marginalized, ousted, and suffocated by Chinazi's jingoism throughout their lives.
A forum like ours can get stumbled by ignorant catchphrases they use, such as "my freedom of expression on this forum." There is no such thing in any private enterprise. What Pincong should have and must preserve is its freedom of speech—an agenda and way of dialogue promoting liberty, reason, dignity, human rights, and happiness—not dominated or hijacked by the very group of thugs that swarm inside the GFW. Upholding the freedom of speech of Pincong as a private forum, as any remarkable private enterprise and social movement would do, is the key to preserving its voice, relevance, and value.
Thanks for your reading and consideration, @okamiyu , @Studebaker史刁碧嘉 , and @Nederland of the current discussion, and all the hardworking admins here.