大内宣墙媒是已经造谣无底线了吗？现在加班加点地要给疫情甩锅？
今天亲戚在微信上给我发了一条“新闻”，说世界卫生组织正式声明新冠并不起源于武汉，只是首先在武汉被发现。然后我查了一下，只找到厦门网这样一个链接（墙内新闻链接警告）：http://news.xmnn. cn/xmnn/2020/11/25/100815673.shtml
然后我自己Google了一下，最近的比较可靠的新闻只是说中国已经同意世卫组织到武汉调查，那怎么就有结论了？相关的新闻只有Twitter上被标记为“China state-affiliated media"的大外宣媒体CGTN的一条推文，而且措辞跟国内大内宣也不一样，说”coronavirus might have started in other parts of the world before China reported the first case.“ （新冠病毒可能在中国报导第一次病例之前已经在世界其他地方出现）
不过即便是这样的措辞也是对原话的刻意误导，这是CGTN自己的英文报道：
An international team of experts has been formed to carry out phase 2 studies.
"We fully expect that we will have a team on the ground. We need to be able to have the international team join our Chinese colleagues and go to the ground and look at the results and outcomes of those phase 1 studies and verify these data on the ground," WHO emergency expert Dr Mike Ryan told a news briefing.
This would help to ensure "that the international community can be reassured of the quality of the science," he said.
The Wuhan market is "likely to have been a point of amplification" of virus transmission, but whether that was by human, animal or environmental spread is not yet known, Ryan said, adding that there had been human cases that preceded that event.
According to Ryan, there may be more than one cases of patient zero in some situations, because there may be more than one species breach.
We're increasingly seeing that viruses have been identified in many different countries, he said. (我们越来越多地看到病毒在很多其他国家被发现）
顺便提一下，墙内媒体所引述的俄罗斯卫星通讯社（Sputnik)是著名的假新闻阴谋论网站，在mediabiasfactcheck上被标注为”真实性极低“ （very low):
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/sputnik-news/
然后我自己Google了一下，最近的比较可靠的新闻只是说中国已经同意世卫组织到武汉调查，那怎么就有结论了？相关的新闻只有Twitter上被标记为“China state-affiliated media"的大外宣媒体CGTN的一条推文，而且措辞跟国内大内宣也不一样，说”coronavirus might have started in other parts of the world before China reported the first case.“ （新冠病毒可能在中国报导第一次病例之前已经在世界其他地方出现）
不过即便是这样的措辞也是对原话的刻意误导，这是CGTN自己的英文报道：
An international team of experts has been formed to carry out phase 2 studies.
"We fully expect that we will have a team on the ground. We need to be able to have the international team join our Chinese colleagues and go to the ground and look at the results and outcomes of those phase 1 studies and verify these data on the ground," WHO emergency expert Dr Mike Ryan told a news briefing.
This would help to ensure "that the international community can be reassured of the quality of the science," he said.
The Wuhan market is "likely to have been a point of amplification" of virus transmission, but whether that was by human, animal or environmental spread is not yet known, Ryan said, adding that there had been human cases that preceded that event.
According to Ryan, there may be more than one cases of patient zero in some situations, because there may be more than one species breach.
We're increasingly seeing that viruses have been identified in many different countries, he said. (我们越来越多地看到病毒在很多其他国家被发现）
顺便提一下，墙内媒体所引述的俄罗斯卫星通讯社（Sputnik)是著名的假新闻阴谋论网站，在mediabiasfactcheck上被标注为”真实性极低“ （very low):
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/sputnik-news/
