旧金山「零元购」：去超市随便自取，盗窃$950以下警察不管

只要拿走的东西不超过$950，居然不犯法！

此部分为事实错误

https://aizmanlaw.com/9-things-didnt-know-shoplifting-charges/
加州刑法Penal Code还是把“进入商店盗窃等于或少于$950的物品的行为”定为shoplifting了

The definition of shoplifting under Penal Code section 459.5 is entering a commercial establishment during regular business hours, with intent to commit larceny, where the value does not exceed $950 (or intent to commit larceny does not exceed that amount).

而shoplifting在加州刑法中是misdemeanor，是比普通的felony要低一级的罪行

Shoplifting在加州刑法的刑罚如下：

The severity of the penalties that a court may impose at sentencing depends on several factors, including the facts of your case and your criminal history.

Depending on the circumstances, a conviction under pc 459.5 can carry probation, jail time, and/or fines as listed:

Misdemeanor

Up to 180 days in county jail

Up to 3 years summary (informal) probation

Fines and fees up to $1000, as determined by the court

Additional requirements, as determined by the court

Any combination of the above, as determined by the court

If you are a noncitizen, ineligibility for admission and other immigration consequences, as determined by the immigration court.

而且嫌疑犯是过往严重犯罪记录的话，如强奸犯性侵犯等，不会被控misdemeanor，反而会被控更严重的罪名

You will not be eligible for a misdemeanor “shoplifting” charge under Penal Code § 459.5 If:

You have any serious or violent convictions. For example, rape, murder, possession of weapon of mass destruction4.

You are registered as a sex offender.

如楼上所说，关于shoplifting的定义是在2014年的Proposition 47公投中从felony更改为misdemeanor的

Under Proposition 47 which was passed into law2, with the November 4, 2014 California election, the legislature added a new misdemeanor section to the Penal Code.

It requires that defendants are sentenced to misdemeanors, instead of felonies, for “non-serious, nonviolent crimes,”

 
所以楼主所说的「不犯法」这部分为事实错误。

就连楼主提供的视频中，旁白也完全没有提到“shoplifting是不违法的”这点。

至于你支不支持这项法律是你的个人意见，本人仅仅是来指出事实错误的部分。
=================================

希望各位葱友看帖子记得要会自己事实核查，不要看到一些震惊体的标题就完全相信，要会自己调查对方说的哪些是对的，哪些是错的，免得被带节奏。