如何解读以下问卷调查?全新2019/5/17出炉

The view from China:
- Most Chinese respondents have either a somewhat (41%) or very (17%) positive view of the U.S. Far fewer feel very (9%) or somewhat (8%) unfavorable.
- When it comes to American democracy, though, just 1% are very favorable and 5% very unfavorable. Most are in the middle — either somewhat favorable (42%) or neutral (40%).
- However, 70% of respondents believe the U.S. should “focus on the flaws in its own political system instead of focusing on the political systems of other countries." Most also want a "less assertive" U.S. foreign policy.
Between the lines: At a time when Washington and Beijing are gearing up for a new Cold War, it's counterintuitive to find that most Chinese actually feel the U.S. political and economic systems set “a positive example for the world.”
- But, but, but: When given a choice of 15 countries and asked which has the best political system, Chinese respondents rank the U.S. second. Far out ahead is China itself.
为什么你国人一边向往美国政体、美国民主,又一边觉得你国买办政府就是好,就是好呀就是好呀就是好?
来源https://amp.axios.com/admiration-china-american-democracy-f2d01ede-3add-49ec-839a-684955405781.html
此题不欢迎大脑降级人@用爱心说诚实话 回答
说实话,我没看懂
做这种调查甚至算是我以前刚出来时候干过的事(不过我当时不涉及政治)但是为啥我没看到数据来源,以及合理的解析这两个很重要的东西?
第一个,
8,9可以说是8和10的进位问题
但是41和17又是什么鬼?17可能是德国的12+6?
反正看不太懂。。。
还一个,数据来源很关键
如果是翻墙的,那肯定扯淡,大外宣没工夫,但是都翻墙,大部分不是傻子,肯定得出的过于“高教育高智力”化,也就是太理想了
如果是实体做的field work,那么在什么省份?多少人,怎么做的分布,很关键,这个跑过全国人口普查的应该明白
我个人觉得隐藏信息过多,导致这张图可看性不高,外加数据对不上,反而容易被人诟病
做这种调查甚至算是我以前刚出来时候干过的事(不过我当时不涉及政治)但是为啥我没看到数据来源,以及合理的解析这两个很重要的东西?
第一个,
- Most Chinese respondents have either a somewhat (41%) or very (17%) positive view of the U.S. Far fewer feel very (9%) or somewhat (8%) unfavorable. 我没看懂。。这是怎么算出来的?
8,9可以说是8和10的进位问题
但是41和17又是什么鬼?17可能是德国的12+6?
反正看不太懂。。。
还一个,数据来源很关键
如果是翻墙的,那肯定扯淡,大外宣没工夫,但是都翻墙,大部分不是傻子,肯定得出的过于“高教育高智力”化,也就是太理想了
如果是实体做的field work,那么在什么省份?多少人,怎么做的分布,很关键,这个跑过全国人口普查的应该明白
我个人觉得隐藏信息过多,导致这张图可看性不高,外加数据对不上,反而容易被人诟病
@tony231
下面那些数据和第一张图不是同一问题
数据从哪来的确实奇怪
下面那些数据和第一张图不是同一问题
数据从哪来的确实奇怪