已删除
17 个评论
既然這麼喜歡中共，把他們立即送中如何
霸凌异见者已经不是言论自由，而是侵犯他人的人权。
支持立即送中。
立刻送他们回赵国
戴维无法理解，有人一边呼吁学校包容多元族群文化，一边为祖国挥向异族的鞭子和屠刀辩护----传说中的东方支慧
是时候重新阅读卡尔·施密特了，《政治的概念》直指政治的本质就是区分敌友，因而魏玛共和国无法决断自由民主的敌人的行为注定要走向自我毁灭。
自己坏事做绝然后还要求利用别人的善良，不给利用就撒泼，我最近都在看着这些垃圾的表演呢
之前这事就是sb，美国学校的美国老师呼吁中国留学生多说多练英语有啥错，是不是还得规定系里必须讲中文有用中文授课选项
送中送中送中送中送中
一群垃圾。
臭味扑鼻
半年前在台湾央广谈留学生“战狼” （全长30分钟）
https://www.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/2011476
明天把全文转过来。
https://www.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/2011476
明天把全文转过来。
因为美国人太傻太好骗了，任何一个中国粪坑长大的人都可以把美国人骗得连裤子都不剩。
一群垃圾, 建議外國政府把這些粉紅送中, 別再禍害其他人。
本文原文系英文，现在把英文版也一并发到这里。
英文版当时没有找到愿意接受的报纸，可能是因为白人老师要中国学生说英语破坏diversity的事太恶劣了，而对于中国学生在美国校园欺负美国人（组织活动的维吾尔女孩出生在美国，被死亡威胁的教授是美国白人），人们从diversity的角度觉得并不是特别重要。
A Dark Side of Chinese Activism on American Campuses
Duke professor Megan Neely, who sent an email urging Chinese students to speak English, has stepped down as director of graduate studies amid a public backlash including a petition advertised by the Chinese Student Association. Although it is inappropriate for a school official to target a group of students who speak a different language, as a student activist from China, I doubt the essence of the Chinese activism that played a key part in her downfall.
During the whole week, Chinese students at Duke and elsewhere have been slamming Professor Neely’s warning as racism. But very rarely have I heard my fellow students talk about the more outrageous fact that Tibetan and Uyghur students are disciplined and expelled for not speaking Chinese among themselves, and that Mr. Tashi Wangchuk, Mr. Abduweli Ayup and other mother tongue advocates remain behind bars. Instead, I see them frequently share social media posts in support of forcible use of the national language, which they believe will turn the “uncivilized” aborigines into loyal Chinese. If they had a positive consensus on equal linguistic rights, why would they turn either blind or approving eyes on their own government’s war on native languages?
Since before the language gate storm, Uyghur American activist and Duke student Aydin Anwar has been working to raise campus awareness of the Orwellian scenario of widespread surveillance, kidnapping, torture and deaths in her occupied homeland. She revealed on Twitter that several Chinese students had disturbed a Uyghur event last week by making noises, asking provocative questions, passing out Beijing’s propaganda materials, and calling guest speakers liars and terrorists. In fact, their harassment was so successful that it dissuaded my Duke friend David from joining the CSA’s cry for campus inclusiveness, which now he suspects as a disguised tactic to push Chinese supremacy in a liberal society. Ironically, the Chinese Students and Scholars Association at UCSD had also demanded inclusiveness in a balked effort to block the Dalai Lama from speaking on campus. Perhaps what confronted Aydin and scared David was just another unusual outburst of Chinese activism on campus, but more scaringly, Chinese social media is teeming with anti-Uyghur sentiment that fuels such activism and confrontations.
With China’s concentration camps going viral, the Duke Kunshan partnership has been under heightened scrutiny. In response to ethical challenges on the joint-venture, William Chang and two other Chinese students co-authored an op-ed in the Chronicle in which they justified Beijing’s heavy-handed crackdown on the Uyghurs with “not unreasonable security concerns”. While acknowledging the need for humanitarian considerations, the article challenged the existence of oppression and advised the university to continue “engagement”. Deliberately or not, these authors were helping a foreign regime lobby their school against a moral decision on the ferocious crimes that regime had committed. They have many reasons to be active in campus politics, especially now in the presence of Dr. Neely’s discriminatory email, but their activism, no matter voluntary or manipulated, has crossed the line in a direction that would compromise Duke’s moral commitments and negatively impact their own future.
Having witnessed a campus conflict 11 years ago in which a pro-Tibet girl was besieged by her fellow Chinese students, Duke University as well as other American schools now faces an upgraded version of Chinese activism equipped with a professional understanding of free speech and political correctness. While it remains under debate to which extent Chinese Students and Scholars Associations (CSSAs) influence students’ politics and how closely those organizations work with consulate officials, today’s Chinese activism on American campuses can be powerful enough to silence internal dissidents and discomfit external critics. Those who choose to keep a low profile include David, who has never visited China but insists he saw Big Brother in the eyes of the girl who gave him a Communist Party handout on that Uyghur night.
英文版当时没有找到愿意接受的报纸，可能是因为白人老师要中国学生说英语破坏diversity的事太恶劣了，而对于中国学生在美国校园欺负美国人（组织活动的维吾尔女孩出生在美国，被死亡威胁的教授是美国白人），人们从diversity的角度觉得并不是特别重要。
A Dark Side of Chinese Activism on American Campuses
Duke professor Megan Neely, who sent an email urging Chinese students to speak English, has stepped down as director of graduate studies amid a public backlash including a petition advertised by the Chinese Student Association. Although it is inappropriate for a school official to target a group of students who speak a different language, as a student activist from China, I doubt the essence of the Chinese activism that played a key part in her downfall.
During the whole week, Chinese students at Duke and elsewhere have been slamming Professor Neely’s warning as racism. But very rarely have I heard my fellow students talk about the more outrageous fact that Tibetan and Uyghur students are disciplined and expelled for not speaking Chinese among themselves, and that Mr. Tashi Wangchuk, Mr. Abduweli Ayup and other mother tongue advocates remain behind bars. Instead, I see them frequently share social media posts in support of forcible use of the national language, which they believe will turn the “uncivilized” aborigines into loyal Chinese. If they had a positive consensus on equal linguistic rights, why would they turn either blind or approving eyes on their own government’s war on native languages?
Since before the language gate storm, Uyghur American activist and Duke student Aydin Anwar has been working to raise campus awareness of the Orwellian scenario of widespread surveillance, kidnapping, torture and deaths in her occupied homeland. She revealed on Twitter that several Chinese students had disturbed a Uyghur event last week by making noises, asking provocative questions, passing out Beijing’s propaganda materials, and calling guest speakers liars and terrorists. In fact, their harassment was so successful that it dissuaded my Duke friend David from joining the CSA’s cry for campus inclusiveness, which now he suspects as a disguised tactic to push Chinese supremacy in a liberal society. Ironically, the Chinese Students and Scholars Association at UCSD had also demanded inclusiveness in a balked effort to block the Dalai Lama from speaking on campus. Perhaps what confronted Aydin and scared David was just another unusual outburst of Chinese activism on campus, but more scaringly, Chinese social media is teeming with anti-Uyghur sentiment that fuels such activism and confrontations.
With China’s concentration camps going viral, the Duke Kunshan partnership has been under heightened scrutiny. In response to ethical challenges on the joint-venture, William Chang and two other Chinese students co-authored an op-ed in the Chronicle in which they justified Beijing’s heavy-handed crackdown on the Uyghurs with “not unreasonable security concerns”. While acknowledging the need for humanitarian considerations, the article challenged the existence of oppression and advised the university to continue “engagement”. Deliberately or not, these authors were helping a foreign regime lobby their school against a moral decision on the ferocious crimes that regime had committed. They have many reasons to be active in campus politics, especially now in the presence of Dr. Neely’s discriminatory email, but their activism, no matter voluntary or manipulated, has crossed the line in a direction that would compromise Duke’s moral commitments and negatively impact their own future.
Having witnessed a campus conflict 11 years ago in which a pro-Tibet girl was besieged by her fellow Chinese students, Duke University as well as other American schools now faces an upgraded version of Chinese activism equipped with a professional understanding of free speech and political correctness. While it remains under debate to which extent Chinese Students and Scholars Associations (CSSAs) influence students’ politics and how closely those organizations work with consulate officials, today’s Chinese activism on American campuses can be powerful enough to silence internal dissidents and discomfit external critics. Those who choose to keep a low profile include David, who has never visited China but insists he saw Big Brother in the eyes of the girl who gave him a Communist Party handout on that Uyghur night.