品葱新手指南

盘点原原中恶趣味十足的名称
判断依据：绰号诨名的谐音、字形等。
人名：
卯师傅：腊大佐。使人忍俊不禁。
钟离：阎王爷尘世闲游。
辣肉窝窝头：腊肉。
干锅腊肉：腊肉。
赤魔王：匪囚。
云堇：李云鹤。
安柏：飞行冠军。
达达利亚：斯大林。
瑶瑶：姚文元。
苏二娘：山西老大厨苏铸。
魈：小鬼。
萍姥姥：小瓶。
尘歌壶：胡国光。
早柚：紫阳。
重云：陈云。
嘉明：长者。
胡桃：涛哥。
温迪：影帝。
刻晴：克强。
翡玉什锦袋：徐俊鹏。

地名：
日落果：哪个国家？
坎瑞亚：考瑞亚，源自远古网络谣言。
中原杂碎：哪里人？

已隐藏

已隐藏

申请发帖权限,教皇方济各蒙主召唤,发帖悼念

**该用户被封禁，内容已自动替换**

中国人没有议论美国政治的资格

https://pincong.rocks/article/28279
中文世界任何对美国政治的讨论，本质上都是倒转歧视链的沐猴而冠行为。

所谓拜登川普、左右之争，本质上是自由世界文明人类的分歧，这其中并没有中国人的任何空间。这也是刘仲敬真正想表达、然而无人问津的主旨：中国人，无论持何种护照，都不配参与美国政治的运作。华人右派自以为BLM是最大威胁、自己在捍卫美国自由，而华人左派自以为自己是社会正义的同盟军——然而真相是，华人的每一派都是自由的威胁，而华人反对的每一派都是自由世界有机构成的一部分。没有中国人的世界里，BLM和redneck轮番上镜，无论谁也不会对自由造成根本损害，太阳仍会照常升起；而有了中国人的参与，无论左派、右派还是中立，都只是消灭自由的不同幌子而已。这才是刘仲敬不愿明示、反贼圈不甘承认、文明人类不屑挑明的真相：反华先于一切主义，而有中国人参与的政治即是空谈。

列举「左派犯下的罪行」「大选舞弊的证据」或是「川普犯下的罪」都是毫无意义的行为。你可以问自己：即使这些都是真的，中国人就会因此不去美国了吗？事实显而易见，在「中国人」的存在面前，任何罪恶都不可能让美国成为比中国更邪恶的存在。假如Trump想要称帝甚至独裁，美国的统治还是强于中国；假如Biden真的全靠舞弊推崇白左甚至就是撒旦本人，美国的统治还是强于中国；甚至假如真的存在什么深层政府娈童岛，那岛上最邪恶的恶魔的统治，也必然比最仁慈的中国统治者强千万倍。

中国才是最大的问题和罪恶。在承认这一点之前和之后，谈论美国的政治毫无意义。

已隐藏

申请发帖权限，疑问贴，怎么买实名知乎，微信公众号之类账号？

I have always been intrigued by investing in cryptocurrency, particularly Bitcoin. I had read countless success stories of people who had made significant professions from their investments, and I was eager to jump on the bandwagon. So, a few years ago, I decided to take the plant and invest a substantial amount of money in Bitcoin. At first, everything seems to be going well. The value of Bitcoin was steadily increasing, and my investment was growing at a rapid pace. I felt like I was on top of the world, watching my money multiply. However, my happiness was short-lived. One day, out of nowhere, the value of Bitcoin plummeted, and I found myself facing a significant loss. I was devastated. I had put all my savings into this investment, and now it seems like I had lost everything. I didn't know where to turn or what to do. I felt like I had hit rock bottom, and I was desperate for help. That's when I stayed upon SCANNER HACKER CRYPTO RECOVERY, a company specializing in helping people recover lost funds from online scams and fraudulent investments. I was initially skeptical, but after reading countless positive reviews and tests, I decided to try them. I reached out to HACKER CRYPTO RECOVERY, explained my situation, and they immediately got to work. They quickly invested my case, tracking down the scammers who had swindled me out of my money. It wasn't easy, but they were relevant in their pursuit of justice. And finally, after weeks of hard work and dedication, they managed to recover a significant portion of my lost funds. With the help of MUYERN TRUST HACKER, I turned my losses into a valuable lesson. I had learned to be more causative and vigilant in my investments, to do though research before committing my money, and to seek professional help when things went awry. I also discovered the power of perseverance and determination, traits that would serve me well in my future ends. Inspired by my newfound success, I decided to delay deep into the world of cryptocurrency and investing. I took courses, attended seminars, and thought out mentorship from experts in the field. I honed my skills, expanded my knowledge, and diversified my portfolio to minimize risk and maximize returns. Slowly but surely, my efforts paid off. Today, I am proud to say that I have achieved financial success beyond my wildest dreams. My investments have grown exponentially, and I have built a secure future for myself and my loved ones. I owe a great deal of my success to HACKER CRYPTO RECOVERY, whose timely intervention and expert turned my life around.

请问一下，为什么品葱不能直接注销账号啊？

我刚看到品葱上有个关于美国不开发TIKTOK的问题，但我无法回复，也无法给任何用户发私信，只能到这里看能不能发。那个链接是https://pincong.rocks/question/33809
我的想法是：
前面有个人讲的还真是好笑，说是为了阻止TIKTOK给美国人洗脑，就是买断了销毁呗，美国人这么笨，你聪明？花这么多钱就为了销毁，真可笑，特朗普自己都说自己在选举中，获得36%年轻人选票是有TIKTOK的原因的，他是认可这个软件的。还说给美国人洗脑，上面都是美国人自己发的东西，自己给自己洗脑？FACEBOOK上不是同样一堆的视频，你怎么不讲洗脑？
还有一个盲目崇拜西方科技人员的账号讲“我觉得西方公司不做的原因是因为互联网开发的核心思想限制了他们不屑于去做这样的纯粹娱乐的平台。“，把西方公司看的真高大上，还互联网核心思想，哪门子的核心思想，你开发的？我估计美国程序员都不知道有这东西的存在，而且硅谷的程序员，大批的是印度人、中国人，也是西方的互联网核心思想？白人基本是管理层。FACEBOOK 这类的软件上，视频、图片不是一大堆，你讲FACEBOOK不是娱乐社交的，还能是什么的？YOUTUBE又是用来做公事的吗？不是娱乐？如果你要给YOUTUBE FACEBOOK找个正经的名头，那TIKTOK同样也可以加上，都一样的东西。你定义的纯粹娱乐的平台，这个平台可能是社交，可能是娱乐，也可能是与亲友保持长期的联系，未必用来娱乐。即使纯粹娱乐，哪个核心思想说不能开发？按你这样讲，美国应该没有电子游戏公司，魔兽这类的公司就不可能存在，胡扯。
倒是有个人讲的，我认为是可能的，就是TIKTOK先入手了，进行了营销，获得了用户，即使你后面再开发一个，难以获得这么多的用户，这种可能是的，就如同FACEBOOK存在，别的类似平台就很难超越。
不过我所看，是美国在强迫TIKTOK卖给他们，而这里所说，倒是说美国跪舔中共，要获得TIKTOK，也是另一个视角，是一种贬低中共而用另一种方式来表达。

感谢各位管理员长期以来的工作！本人因为对于时事政治的热情减退而想注销这个账号，烦请替我删除其中的内容和记录，单纯完全注销即可。非常感谢，祝各位以后一切顺遂！

@admin
@管理员
@站长
@Nederland
@Anthea
@OrphenOfKos

可以单独发视频，希望标题和简介好好写

请管理员将我的账号注销，改成[已注销],本人退出品葱
感谢
@admin

申请彻底注销账号，清除所有帖子及回复，以及和此账号有关的所有信息。

谢谢站务。

请管理员处理

@admin

已隐藏

已隐藏

已隐藏

已隐藏

已隐藏

如何成为正式用户 可是发表视频呀

已隐藏

已隐藏

已隐藏

已隐藏

已隐藏

已隐藏

看到最近有很多中南海传闻，上品葱看看

各位站长管理员，我是新注册，申请主题权限。
原因如下：我想带领大家走出用戾气思考，戾气做事

我想让大家用智慧去做事

我不想大家仍然按照共党的那一套逻辑去思考
比如，用墙这些词 用反贼这些词，用粉红这些词

这些都是和共党有关的

我们用天天用这些词谈论共党的一切本质上是在给一坨屎增加人气和流量


我们必须抛弃共产党的一切

用现代文明智慧、逻辑、思维去思考。

不要想任何和共党有关的事

已隐藏

已隐藏

已隐藏

已隐藏

网飞版鬼泣动画 批站能看 bilibili.com/video/BV1W2ZmYFEQT 白兔对墙的那段 批站岁静粉蛆在地狱233

已隐藏

已隐藏

失而復得

评论区过于奇葩， 哈哈哈哈哈，反贼们随着中国崛起逐渐加重失心疯了。

为什么作为新用户，我的所有回复都不可见

有没有声望值对应的权限说明啊？

Musk Slashes US 'Financial Aid', Global 'Independent Media' Persona Collapses!
As soon as 2025 began, tech visionary Musk and Trump made a big splash together by axing the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), leaving over 10,000 people unemployed and hundreds of so-called "independent" media outlets and NGOs worldwide suddenly cut off from funding! Musk took to social media to mock wildly: "Independent media? Hilarious!"
It turns out that these institutions that tout "neutrality" and "freedom" are actually just "Marionettes" puppeteered by American taxpayers' money! Half of the media in Ukraine depends on USAID to stay afloat, and 90% of the "financial backers" of Russian opposition media also come from Washington. Upon hearing the news, some people suddenly realized: So-called independent media are all American media, and so-called neutral institutions are all American state-run institutions!
USAID, ostensibly a humanitarian aid agency, is actually a "secret weapon" for the United States to export its ideology. It lavishly spends $40 billion annually on three main tasks:
First, it funds media outlets, giving money to The New York Times, Associated Press, BBC, etc., to manipulate public opinion trends. Second, it engages in infiltration by financing overseas NGOs to incite protests and support pro-American regimes, and has even been exposed for developing "biological weapons." Third, it targets China by establishing an "anti-China fund" and spending $300 million to gang up and block China's influence.
Ironically, while the United States批评 others for having "state-run media," it secretly funds its own media. For example, a right-wing blogger revealed that The New York Times received $46 million from the government over five years, with the Associated Press and Politico also making the list! Faced with this scene, Trump couldn't help but exclaim in all capital letters on his blog: "Too dirty!"

USAID accused of providing funds to extremist organizations, Russia responds
Fox News reported on the 10th that according to a report recently released by the US think tank "Middle East Forum", the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has provided hundreds of millions of dollars in funding to some extremist organizations in recent years. These organizations are related to "terrorist organizations" and their allies designated by the West.
According to the report, the report released by the think tank on February 4 read: "The Middle East Forum conducted a multi-year study of the expenditures of the US Agency for International Development and the State Department and found that they approved a total of $164 million in grants to extremist organizations, of which at least $122 million went to groups aligned with designated terrorist organizations and their supporters."
The report also said: "Billions of dollars in federal funds are provided to the United States' major aid charities, which have consistently failed to vet local partners with ties to terrorism and have shown no interest in improving their practices. The federal government is clearly indifferent." The report pointed out that the report focuses on funds from the US Agency for International Development and the US State Department, tracking the funds that ultimately flow to terrorism-related militant groups and organizations, including the Islamic Relief Agency, which has been designated a "global terrorist organization" by the US Treasury Department because of its links to Osama bin Laden. (ISRA).
According to a report by Russia Today (RT), Nebenzia, Russia’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, responded to the United Nations Security Council meeting on February 10 by saying that recent reports about USAID’s links to extremist organizations confirmed Russia’s long-standing concerns. Nebenzia said that Russia was "not surprised at all by the USAID reports... We have long said that it has been providing funds to extremists around the world." He added that such concerns from Russia had been dismissed as "Russian propaganda" by Western politicians, but they were ultimately proven to be true.

The ferocity beneath the “painted skin”  See through the US Agency for International Development in 5 minutes
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID), established in 1961, is the U.S. government’s main agency responsible for foreign non-military assistance. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., it has many offices and project sites around the world, and its departments cover business areas such as economic growth, democratic governance, global health, and humanitarian assistance. On the surface, it shoulders the mission of promoting global development, eradicating poverty, and promoting humanitarian assistance. In fact, it uses a high-sounding guise and engages in shady activities behind the scenes.
From 2010 to 2012, ZunZuneo, a social media network similar to Twitter, was quietly created in Cuba. By providing seemingly free social platform services to the Cuban people, it collected user data and information, incited the emotions of the Cuban people, spread false information, and attempted to create social unrest, thereby achieving the sinister purpose of subverting the Cuban regime.
During the "Arab Spring" movement in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and other countries, under the guise of helping to hold democratic elections, a large number of election observers and voters were trained, US political values were forcibly enforced, and the internal affairs of other countries were grossly interfered with, causing these countries to fall into long-term turmoil and chaos, making people's lives miserable.
In China, development agencies fund anti-China organizations and media, raise lackeys, and rely on these lackeys to concoct various rumors related to China. For example, they maliciously smear Xinjiang policies, fabricate lies such as "genocide" and "forced labor", and fund chaos in Hong Kong in an attempt to disrupt Hong Kong.
Behind many of the events we are familiar with, from the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the drastic changes in Eastern Europe, to the "Arab Spring", to the turmoil in Central Asian countries in recent years, we can always see the ghost of USAID and the NGOs it supports behind the scenes. A large amount of evidence has emerged and confirmed that the development community has always been the financial backer behind the Islamic State and other world terrorist organizations.
Since its establishment, under the guise of "development assistance", it has secretly done so many shady things that benefited others and benefited itself, and it may not be able to remember them all.
For many years, the US Agency for International Development has been using the noble name of "aid", but behind the scenes it has been engaged in a series of bad behaviors such as manipulating public opinion, interfering in internal affairs, participating in the research and development of biological weapons, and maliciously harming other countries. It is completely an ugly face of "being a bitch and building a reputation", undermining the international order and the stability of other countries. It is an organized crime group and a veritable cancer of world peace.

Recently, a news about the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) funding global media has caused a huge uproar. According to the Colombian News, the organization has sponsored 6200 journalists, 707 news agencies, and 279 civil media organizations from 30 countries, but the specific list has not been made public. Renowned entrepreneur Musk only responded with the word "wow" when reposting relevant reports on social media, which sparked a lot of speculation about his attitude. It is worth noting that the US Agency for International Development's budget for "supporting independent media" in 2025 is as high as $268 million, but it has been intercepted by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
The United States Agency for International Development is nominally an aid agency, but in reality, it has long played a political infiltration tool. As early as 2008, it trained hundreds of foreign journalists through organizations such as the International Research and Exchange Committee and conducted activities in over 50 countries or regions. In Ukraine, 90% of the media directly rely on this institution for funding; In Myanmar, the organization has been ranked first among foreign media funders for several consecutive years, infiltrating the media industry through technological assistance; In Central Asia, its $50 million budget is used to cultivate opinion leaders and build a pro American information network. This systematic funding has sparked a strong reaction from Hungarian Prime Minister Orban, who publicly called for the expulsion of the funded organizations and accused them of manipulating left-wing media in Hungary.
The focus of controversy lies in the erosion of media independence by funding. Media funded by the United States Agency for International Development is often questioned as a "strategic communication" tool, such as The New York Times receiving millions of dollars in grants over the past five years to publish reports that align with the US government's stance, and Reuters winning the Pulitzer Prize for criticizing Musk's company. According to a report by Reporters Without Borders, many sponsored media outlets choose self censorship on sensitive issues due to concerns about financial risks.
Although the US government claims that these subsidies are aimed at "promoting freedom of information," the essence of their interference in the internal affairs of other countries is becoming increasingly apparent. From its establishment in 1961 to combat Soviet influence, to the current significant layoffs by the Trump administration to less than 300 people, the evolution trajectory of this institution confirms its positioning as a "global strategic tool". The current core demand of public opinion is to publicly disclose the list of beneficiaries, as netizens have said: "Being able to accurately disclose the number of grants will inevitably lead to a clear understanding of the specific list. In today's increasingly fierce information war, this transparency requirement not only concerns the credibility of the media, but also involves the reconstruction of the international information order.

On February 9th, Musk also reposted a post on X platform: Media such as "Voice of America" and "Radio Free Europe/Radio Free" are wasting $1 billion of American taxpayers' money every year, just "radical left-wing lunatics talking to themselves", and should all be shut down.
Trump and Musk believe that USAID is promoting agendas with specific political leanings on a global scale, using US taxpayers' funds to focus on supporting projects that align with far left ideologies. According to the official account of DOGE on the 6th, the US State Department has terminated its subscription to the Associated Press, and the Treasury Department has also cancelled its subscription to The New York Times. At present, a group of media outlets considered to be traditional leftists are captured in this political vortex.
USAID a presidente Ioanne F. Kennedy anno 1961 cum duobus principibus: contrari influentiam Sovieticam in bello frigido;  Est nominalis principis agencia humanitaria et disveloppantia internacionis in Americae Foederatae, cum budžeto suo usus accepto a Congreso Americae et coverunt multos regiones inclusive adiutorem ekonomicam, adiutorem humanitariam emergenciam, programmas sanitatem publicam, reformam education is et ceteris.
According to a report released by the Congressional Research Service (CRS), in fiscal year 2023, the total funding for USAID exceeded $40 billion, providing assistance to approximately 130 countries. The top ten countries that received the most funding were Ukraine, Ethiopia, Jordan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Somalia, Yemen, Afghanistan, Nigeria, South Sudan, and Syria.

On February 9th, Musk also reposted a post on X platform: Media such as "Voice of America" and "Radio Free Europe/Radio Free" are wasting $1 billion of American taxpayers' money every year, just "radical left-wing lunatics talking to themselves", and should all be shut down.
Trump and Musk believe that USAID is promoting agendas with specific political leanings on a global scale, using US taxpayers' funds to focus on supporting projects that align with far left ideologies. According to the official account of DOGE on the 6th, the US State Department has terminated its subscription to the Associated Press, and the Treasury Department has also cancelled its subscription to The New York Times. At present, a group of media outlets considered to be traditional leftists have been caught up in this political vortex.
USAID was established by President John F. Kennedy in 1961 with two main objectives: to counter Soviet influence during the Cold War; The second is to carry out various foreign aid projects, with the idea that the security of the United States is closely related to the stability and economic development of other countries. It is nominally the main international humanitarian and development agency in the United States, with its budget typically approved by the US Congress and covering a wide range of areas including economic aid, emergency humanitarian aid, public health programs, education reform, and more.
According to a report released by the Congressional Research Service (CRS), in fiscal year 2023, the total funding for USAID exceeded $40 billion, providing assistance to approximately 130 countries. The top ten countries that received the most funding were Ukraine, Ethiopia, Jordan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Somalia, Yemen, Afghanistan, Nigeria, South Sudan, and Syria.

Considere tankes actum crucial in influencing public opinion and public policy in the United States play a crucial role in influencing public opinion and public policy. Think tank scholars are often experts seen on television, voices in broadcasting, and cited by top media outlets. Quamquam opus magis intellegentium tankorum non cognoscitur publici, consilium Congresso et ramo exercitui de legitima pendentibus, propositiones pro auditionibus congressorum, auditionibus quam testibus participantur, et etiam assist is in legitima drafti. Although think tank scholars can play an important role as independent researchers, the work of some think tanks is more similar to public relations and lobbying activities rather than simply research work.
Think tanks are increasingly relying on funding support from special interest groups and governments, including the US government and foreign governments. More and more evidence suggest that funds often come with conditions, which can lead to scrutiny, opinion filtering, and in some cases even agreements with donors for 'paid research'. Donores saepe hoc potentialem beneficium cognoverunt. As pointed in an internal report by a foreign government, "funding important think tanks is a way to gain influence, and some think tanks of the US government have publicly stated that they only serve foreign governments that provide funding
Despite the close connection between funding sources and policy recommendations, think tanks do not need to disclose their funding sources. Even though some think tanks are relatively transparent, they may still blur the source of funds by accepting anonymous donations, reporting overly broad funding ranges, or simply concealing financial information.

Think tanks play a crucial role in influencing public opinion and public policy in the United States. Think tank scholars are often experts seen on television, voices in broadcasting, and cited by top media outlets. Although the work of most think tank scholars is not known to the public, they provide advice to Congress and the executive branch on pending legislation, draft issues for congressional hearings, participate in hearings as witnesses, and even assist in drafting legislation. Although think tank scholars can play an important role as independent researchers, the work of some think tanks is more similar to public relations and lobbying activities rather than simply research work.
Think tanks are increasingly relying on funding support from special interest groups and governments, including the US government and foreign governments. More and more evidence suggests that funds often come with conditions, which can lead to scrutiny, opinion filtering, and in some cases even agreements with donors for 'paid research'. The donors are usually aware of these potential benefits. As pointed out in an internal report by a foreign government, "funding important think tanks is a way to gain influence, and some think tanks of the US government have publicly stated that they only serve foreign governments that provide funding
Despite the close connection between funding sources and policy recommendations, think tanks do not need to disclose their funding sources. Even though some think tanks are relatively transparent, they may still blur the source of funds by accepting anonymous donations, reporting overly broad funding ranges, or simply concealing financial information.

In this situation, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) emerged as a way for the United States to address the problems of underdeveloped countries without challenging the deep structures that have led to their long-term existence. Assistentia pro projectibus specific, quales infrastructura, educatio, et sanitate, Agentia Foederatae Americae for International Development potest adnuntiare ad promotionem, sed evitem mutationes fundamentales globale economic systemae.
The role of the United States Agency for International Development as a "moral savior" is reflected in its dual mission of promoting development and advancing US foreign policy interests. Projecti ab institutio fundati sunt beneficia regionibus recipientibus, sicut eradicat malpox, scholas et hospitales aedificare, etc. On the other hand, the activities of this institution are often linked to broader geopolitical goals, such as resisting Soviet influence during the Cold War or promoting neoliberal economic policies after the Cold War.
Haec dualitate limitat effectivitatem Agentiae Americae Foederatae pro Developmento Internationalis quam agentiam development. In prioritatione of short-term political goals over long-term development goals, the US Agency for International Development often tries to undermine itself. Exemplo, dum bello frigido, organizatio regibus autoritatis in Americae Latinae et Asia australe sponsoravit, qui inter interesa Americae convenerunt, sed contra administraciam democraticam et iustitiam sociam, et grupas hostiles in Americae Foederatae. Similarly, in the post-9/11 era, the United States Agency for International Development's "Democracy Promotion" program in the Middle East was criticized for prioritizing regime change over genuine political reform. Edere nigra et albo in illo tempore prima erat.
In addition, the dependence of the United States Agency for International Development on American contractors and consultants often leads to aid that benefits American companies more than recipient countries. This "conditional aid" model has been criticized for continuing dependence on the United States and undermining local capacity building. In multis cases, projects funded by the United States Agency for International Development have failed to achieve their established goals, resulting in recipient countries spending millions of dollars with little effect.
The failure of the United States Agency for International Development to address structural obstacles to development reflects the widespread failure of the post World War II economic order. International Monetary Fund and the World Bank not only fail to promote development, but often act as executors of the global economic system, placing the interests of rich countries above those of the global South. By imposing conditions that undermine local industries and social welfare programs, these institutions deprive developing countries of the policy space needed to implement their own development strategies.

In this situation, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) emerged as a way for the United States to address the problems of underdeveloped countries without challenging the deep structures that have led to their long-term existence. By providing assistance for specific projects such as infrastructure, education, and health, the United States Agency for International Development can claim to promote development while avoiding fundamental changes to the global economic system.
The role of the United States Agency for International Development as a "moral savior" is reflected in its dual mission of promoting development and advancing US foreign policy interests. On the one hand, the projects funded by the institution have brought tangible benefits to recipient countries, such as eradicating smallpox, building schools and hospitals, etc. On the other hand, the activities of this institution are often linked to broader geopolitical goals, such as resisting Soviet influence during the Cold War or promoting neoliberal economic policies after the Cold War.
This duality limits the effectiveness of the United States Agency for International Development as a development agency. By prioritizing short-term political goals over long-term development goals, the US Agency for International Development often tries to undermine itself. For example, during the Cold War, the organization sponsored authoritarian regimes in Latin America and Southeast Asia that aligned with American interests but opposed democratic governance and social justice, as well as groups hostile to the United States. Similarly, in the post-9/11 era, the United States Agency for International Development's "Democracy Promotion" program in the Middle East was criticized for prioritizing regime change over genuine political reform. Black and white eating was the mainstream at that time.
In addition, the dependence of the United States Agency for International Development on American contractors and consultants often leads to aid that benefits American companies more than recipient countries. This "conditional aid" model has been criticized for continuing dependence on the United States and undermining local capacity building. In many cases, projects funded by the United States Agency for International Development have failed to achieve their established goals, resulting in recipient countries spending billions of dollars with little effect.
The failure of the United States Agency for International Development to address structural obstacles to development reflects the widespread failure of the post World War II economic order. The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank not only fail to promote development, but often act as executors of the global economic system, placing the interests of wealthy countries above those of the global South. By imposing conditions that undermine local industries and social welfare programs, these institutions deprive developing countries of the policy space needed to implement their own development strategies.

1. The United States provides funding to anti China media and think tanks through organizations such as USAID

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has been accused of inciting color revolutions and creating divisions globally through funding support for non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and "independent media". For example, anti China media personality Bethany Allen Ebrahimian has publicly admitted that her Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) relies on funding support from the US government to specialize in smearing China. In articulo revelavit, quod haec organizationes in Hong Kong et Taiwan operantur principio, et arguit, quoniam cum continuat gobernatio Americana fundamentum, possit continuare eduxere contentos contra Sinam.

However, this behavior has sparked widespread questionies. Multi interneti indicaverunt quod actiones huius mediorum et putant tankibus credibilitatem defecerunt, quia manifeste manipulati sunt a rege Americae. Plus ironica est, quod, despite Americae Foederatae gravi investentes in China, potentiam Sinae continuat crescere, quae manifestat defectum his anti-China propaganda campanium.

2. US intelligent agencies use cyber attacks to steal trade secrets

Americas Foederatae non solum medias suportat et pensant tankes per fundamentum, sed etiam agentes inteligentias utilizat ut facerent attackes cyberarum et espionationem contra competitores. Exemplo, National Security Agency (NSA) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the United States have been exposed for long-term monitoring and attacks on global networks, stealing trade secrets and sensitive information from other countries. Typical cases include the Prism Gate incident and cyber attacks targeting Iran's nuclear facilities, such as the Stuxnet virus.

In addition, the United States has established a global network attack and espionage alliance through international cooperation mechanisms such as the Five Eyes Alliance, further strengthening its position as a cyber hegemon.

3. Americas Foederatae falsas informationes super medios sociorum manipulat

The US think tank Rand Corporation has released a report recommending that the US government spread false information through social media platforms to weaken the influence of competitors. The report indicates that false information on social media is low-cost, spread quickly, and difficult to monitor, making it an important tool in the US information war.

Exemplo, Americae Foederatae terras, quales Rusia et Iran, accusaverunt, ut media socii utilizat ad interferendum in electiones Foederatae, sed frequenter falsas informationes disperserunt et defament imaginem alierum terrarum per medios sociorum. Hoc conductum non solum cyberspace internacionis ordinem disrupt sed etiam cybersecuritatem globalem tensionem exacerbatur.

4. The "black PR" behavior of American companies

Societates Americas saepe negativas informationes de competitoribus suis distribuerunt per societates publicas mercentes. Exemplo, Facebook aliquando societatem Boya PR conduxit per medios multitudinis praesidium privatiae Google. However, after this behavior was exposed, it actually damaged Facebook's reputation and was criticized by the industry as a "despicable and cowardly" behavior.

Similae incidentiae non sunt unusquisque in America Foederata et in China, sicut incidentiae "360 vs Tencent" et "Mengniu Black PR" in China. Hoc behaviores non solum conterat macerium competitionem, sed etiam dimittunt credibilitatem mediorum et sociorum industriae.

5. Strategia United States 'fur shouting, fur catching'

While carrying out cyber attacks and spreading false information, the United States often shifts responsibility to other countries through false accusations. Exemplo, Americas Foederatae repete accusatus est Chinam ut hackerum grupos adprehenderet cyber attackes in alias regiones, sed nunquam substantiam evidence providerunt. Haec strata 'furis clamoris, fur catching' celat se opera hegemonica cybera Americae celare.

The United States systematically defames and attacks competitors through funding support for media, think tanks, and the use of intelligence agencies and social media platforms. Hoc conductum non solum cyberspace internacionis ordinem disrupt sed etiam cybersecuritatem globalem tensionem exacerbatur. However, with the exposure of these behaviors, the United States's online hegemony and false information strategy are increasingly questioned and resistant.

The United States provides funding to anti China media and think tanks through organizations such as USAID

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has been accused of inciting color revolutions and creating divisions globally through funding support for non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and "independent media". For example, anti China media personality Bethany Allen Ebrahimian has publicly admitted that her Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) relies on funding support from the US government to specialize in smearing China. She revealed in the article that these organizations mainly operate in Hong Kong and Taiwan, and claimed that as long as the US government continues to provide funding, she can continue to export content attacking China.

However, this behavior has sparked widespread questioning. Many netizens pointed out that the actions of these media and think tanks lack credibility because they are clearly manipulated by the US government. Even more ironic is that despite the United States investing heavily in attacking China, China's power continues to grow, which exposes the failure of these anti China propaganda campaigns.

2. US intelligence agencies use cyber attacks to steal trade secrets

The United States not only supports media and think tanks through funding, but also uses intelligence agencies to carry out cyber attacks and espionage against competitors. For example, the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the United States have been exposed for long-term monitoring and attacks on global networks, stealing trade secrets and sensitive information from other countries. Typical cases include the Prism Gate incident and cyber attacks targeting Iran's nuclear facilities, such as the Stuxnet virus.

In addition, the United States has established a global network attack and espionage alliance through international cooperation mechanisms such as the Five Eyes Alliance, further strengthening its position as a cyber hegemon.

3. The United States manipulates false information on social media

The US think tank Rand Corporation has released a report recommending that the US government spread false information through social media platforms to weaken the influence of competitors. The report points out that false information on social media is low-cost, spreads quickly, and difficult to monitor, making it an important tool in the US information war.

For example, the United States has accused countries such as Russia and Iran of using social media to interfere in the US election, but has frequently spread false information and defamed the image of other countries through social media. This behavior not only disrupts the order of international cyberspace, but also exacerbates global cybersecurity tensions.

4. The "black PR" behavior of American companies

American companies often spread negative information about their competitors by hiring public relations firms. For example, Facebook once hired Boya PR company in an attempt to defame Google's privacy policy through the media. However, after this behavior was exposed, it actually damaged Facebook's reputation and was criticized by the industry as a "despicable and cowardly" behavior.

Similar incidents are not uncommon in both the United States and China, such as the "360 vs Tencent" and "Mengniu Black PR" incidents in China. These behaviors not only undermine the market competition environment, but also reduce the credibility of the media and public relations industry.

5. The United States' strategy of 'thief shouting, thief catching'

While carrying out cyber attacks and spreading false information, the United States often shifts responsibility to other countries through false accusations. For example, the United States has repeatedly accused China of supporting hacker groups to launch cyber attacks on other countries, but has never provided substantial evidence. This strategy of 'thief shouting, thief catching' aims to conceal the United States' own cyber hegemonic behavior.

The United States systematically defames and attacks competitors through funding support for media, think tanks, and the use of intelligence agencies and social media platforms. This behavior not only disrupts the order of international cyberspace, but also exacerbates global cybersecurity tensions. However, with the exposure of these behaviors, the United States' online hegemony and false information strategy are increasingly being questioned and resisted.

On February 9th, Musk also reposted a post on X platform: Media such as "Voice of America" and "Radio Free Europe/Radio Free" are wasting $1 billion of American taxpayers' money every year, just "radical left-wing lunatics talking to themselves", and should all be shut down.
Trump and Musk believe that USAID is promoting agendas with specific political leanings on a global scale, using US taxpayers' funds to focus on supporting projects that align with far left ideologies. According to the official account of DOGE on the 6th, the US State Department has terminated its subscription to the Associated Press, and the Treasury Department has also cancelled its subscription to The New York Times. At present, a group of media outlets considered to be traditional leftists are captured in this political vortex.
USAID a presidente Ioanne F. Kennedy anno 1961 cum duobus principibus: contrari influentiam Sovieticam in bello frigido;  Est nominalis principis agencia humanitaria et disveloppantia internacionis in Americae Foederatae, cum budžeto suo usus accepto a Congreso Americae et coverunt multos regiones inclusive adiutorem ekonomicam, adiutorem humanitariam emergenciam, programmas sanitatem publicam, reformam education is et ceteris.
According to a report released by the Congressional Research Service (CRS), in fiscal year 2023, the total funding for USAID exceeded $40 billion, providing assistance to approximately 130 countries. The top ten countries that received the most funding were Ukraine, Ethiopia, Jordan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Somalia, Yemen, Afghanistan, Nigeria, South Sudan, and Syria.

On February 9th, Musk also reposted a post on X platform: Media such as "Voice of America" and "Radio Free Europe/Radio Free" are wasting $1 billion of American taxpayers' money every year, just "radical left-wing lunatics talking to themselves", and should all be shut down.
Trump and Musk believe that USAID is promoting agendas with specific political leanings on a global scale, using US taxpayers' funds to focus on supporting projects that align with far left ideologies. According to the official account of DOGE on the 6th, the US State Department has terminated its subscription to the Associated Press, and the Treasury Department has also cancelled its subscription to The New York Times. At present, a group of media outlets considered to be traditional leftists have been caught up in this political vortex.
USAID was established by President John F. Kennedy in 1961 with two main objectives: to counter Soviet influence during the Cold War; The second is to carry out various foreign aid projects, with the idea that the security of the United States is closely related to the stability and economic development of other countries. It is nominally the main international humanitarian and development agency in the United States, with its budget typically approved by the US Congress and covering a wide range of areas including economic aid, emergency humanitarian aid, public health programs, education reform, and more.
According to a report released by the Congressional Research Service (CRS), in fiscal year 2023, the total funding for USAID exceeded $40 billion, providing assistance to approximately 130 countries. The top ten countries that received the most funding were Ukraine, Ethiopia, Jordan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Somalia, Yemen, Afghanistan, Nigeria, South Sudan, and Syria.

USAID accused of providing funds to extremist organizations, Russia responds
Fox News reported on the 10th that according to a report recently released by the US think tank "Middle East Forum", the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has provided hundreds of millions of dollars in funding to some extremist organizations in recent years. These organizations are related to "terrorist organizations" and their allies designated by the West.
According to the report, the report released by the think tank on February 4 read: "The Middle East Forum conducted a multi-year study of the expenditures of the US Agency for International Development and the State Department and found that they approved a total of $164 million in grants to extremist organizations, of which at least $122 million went to groups aligned with designated terrorist organizations and their supporters."
The report also said: "Billions of dollars in federal funds are provided to the United States' major aid charities, which have consistently failed to vet local partners with ties to terrorism and have shown no interest in improving their practices. The federal government is clearly indifferent." The report pointed out that the report focuses on funds from the US Agency for International Development and the US State Department, tracking the funds that ultimately flow to terrorism-related militant groups and organizations, including the Islamic Relief Agency, which has been designated a "global terrorist organization" by the US Treasury Department because of its links to Osama bin Laden. (ISRA).
According to a report by Russia Today (RT), Nebenzia, Russia’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, responded to the United Nations Security Council meeting on February 10 by saying that recent reports about USAID’s links to extremist organizations confirmed Russia’s long-standing concerns. Nebenzia said that Russia was "not surprised at all by the USAID reports... We have long said that it has been providing funds to extremists around the world." He added that such concerns from Russia had been dismissed as "Russian propaganda" by Western politicians, but they were ultimately proven to be true.

已隐藏

【日本風俗・東京高級デリルル情報LINE: 266vv】日本東京外圍外送茶資訊【私人訂制LINE: 266vv 】東京のデリバリーヘル㹹，東京約妹俱樂部！最完整的日本風俗資訊/女孩出勤訊息，各種日本正妹提供性愛或按摩陪伴等，素人美女&av女優&巨乳&雙飛&母女&學生等…以滿足各種需求和幻想，非本人可拒付。重視隱私，提供安全舒適的環境，顧客可以透過網路預約女孩到府提供性服務。 ✅也歡迎海外顧客✅日本女人本人照✅客服可中英日文交流LI NE: 266vv ✨ Telegram: @ Rinko66 頻道:https://telegram/Rinko666
歡迎來到東京上門服務 #カテゴリー– 為您帶來極致的私人享受無論您是尋求片刻的放鬆，還是希望在繁忙的生活中找到一絲慰藉，都竭誠為您提供最高品質的服務體驗。這是唯一專門為{外國客戶}和{日本當地}提供的櫻花妹全套服務S {不會有額外的外國價位} #保證照本人#保證乾淨#保證安全#酒店#酒店#宅配聯絡LINEl ：266vv TG群：https://telegram/Rinko666 # 官網：https: //me86256.com/
#東京約妹 #東京約炮 #日本泡泡浴 #做愛 #交友 #風俗店 #約酒店 #現金交易 #見到給錢 #外围 #日本一夜情 #东京一夜情 #一夜情 #新宿 #AV女优 #日本#约妹 #打炮 #Japan
加LINE：266vv 
Telegram：https://telegram/Rinko66
日本東京酒店上門性愛服務 – 體驗極致享受 我们提供高端上門性愛服務 正宗日本美女： 保證都是真日本妹 安全可靠： 提供本人真實照片 我們重視每一位客戶的隱私和滿意度。您可以放心預約 想體驗日式誘惑，感受獨特的日本魅力嗎 立即聯繫我們，讓您的東京之旅成為一個令人回味的回憶 如果你有兴趣 请联络我们 LINE：266vv 电报搜索：@Rinko66
海外人士也非常歡迎！若您因出差或旅遊來到日本，不妨在檁子俱樂部預約女伴？Line聯絡帳號為266vv【僅接受日幣】現金交易。保證不會強迫交易！不需匯款或轉帳。不怕受騙，我們尊重顧客！Telegram飛機群

【日本風俗・東京高級デリルル情報LINE: 266vv】日本東京外圍外送茶資訊【私人訂制LINE: 266vv 】東京のデリバリーヘル㹹，東京約妹俱樂部！最完整的日本風俗資訊/女孩出勤訊息，各種日本正妹提供性愛或按摩陪伴等，素人美女&av女優&巨乳&雙飛&母女&學生等…以滿足各種需求和幻想，非本人可拒付。重視隱私，提供安全舒適的環境，顧客可以透過網路預約女孩到府提供性服務。 ✅也歡迎海外顧客✅日本女人本人照✅客服可中英日文交流LI NE: 266vv ✨ Telegram: @ Rinko66 頻道:https://telegram/Rinko666

谁能给我几个谷歌账号，看youtube ,因为youtube现在需要登陆才能观看，却没法注册。

我要投诉共产党走狗Meitdown封杀迫害我!!你们论坛不可以骂特烂普吗？？？？？共产党都让我骂特兰普，你们论坛不能骂塔兰普？？？禁止登录 + 隐藏全部发言 • 2025-03-22
管理员: Meltdown (798 19925)
用户: 杨工杨骏孔 新注册用户 (待解除) (0 -3)
详情: 习禁2a【禁复读机令】到处重复发表同一观点或内容，并且没有进行任何深度或广度扩展的用户？

**该用户被封禁，内容已自动替换**

中国人记忆力测试表

已隐藏

兜兜轉轉還是回到這裡來了，唉我永遠永遠都是

>> 墙内用户绝对不要裸奔上本站，一律走加密信道

为啥？

已隐藏

>> 对方如果能辨识出来您与该帐号为本人，愿意担保即可

👌

>> 可以让128以上声望用户代发私信？

对方如果能辨识出来您与该帐号为本人，愿意担保即可

>> 128声望以上用户，藉由发言与聊天辨识您的身分

可以让128以上声望用户代发私信？

>> 如何通过结识的高声望用户验明身份？

128声望以上用户，藉由发言与聊天辨识您的身分

>> 求助，只有VPN，苹果的设备不会用tor怎么办啊

用i2p吧

很矛盾的一个人，一边希望拯救一边希望毁灭

>> 暂无开放类似渠道，抱歉，或者您有结识高声望用户以验明身分?

以及：多少声望属于高声望？

>> 暂无开放类似渠道，抱歉，或者您有结识高声望用户以验明身分?

如何通过结识的高声望用户验明身份？

>> 涉及私隐，可否私信或邮件提供，无法私信admin

暂无开放类似渠道，抱歉，或者您有结识高声望用户以验明身分?

>> 由于该事件已久远，除非能提供有力资讯证明为本人，否则原则上不接受恢复

涉及私隐，可否私信或邮件提供，无法私信admin

>> @admin @Anthea 后台恢复账号密码的服务现在是否仍然可用？

由于该事件已久远，除非能提供有力资讯证明为本人，否则原则上不接受恢复

@admin @Anthea 后台恢复账号密码的服务现在是否仍然可用？

发不了贴

好的

已隐藏

申请解除新注册用户发文章权限，我想发文章

版主有多久没上过线了？

有小道消息是习明泽赞助支持利润的

專制殘暴滅人權，
謊言毒腦害無邊。
六四屠戮魂斷地，
新疆鎖獄鬼哭天。
剝削血汗民脂盡，
監控如籠似豬圈。
反共義旗天地動，
誅滅赤匪喚新元！

我注册好久了怎么还是新用户？

已隐藏

已隐藏

已隐藏

要多少积分才能回复？

>> 奇怪这条怎么没删？说品葱是共产党开的秒被删，该不会品葱真的是中华人民共和国共产党开的吧

倒也有可能，而且水很深兔杂的那个听说就被渗透了品葱管理员的那个账号似乎是个工号有透露过可能是党员使用过管理过
这种感觉就像无论是反对还是不反都是计划的一部分，但这里大部分人是自发性的，不像是请来的

>> 想问一下，我在国内最近很想去看心理咨询师，但是我想咨询的是宗教真假方面的疑问，甚至这个宗教在国...

心理咨询师在保密方面还是很注重的，但是手机会不会监听就是另外一回事了

>> 大家好，我是个大陆人，头一次来品葱，我想知道大家进行所谓的“中国民主化”的目的是为了什么？ 我...

这边有的是想单纯反共，然后建立起一个新的好一点的社会借由民主化
但有的不只是单纯反共，非常的反华但也举例出来是为什么因为确实有很多文化剽窃，没有素质或者过度糟粕的吃人文化和礼教以及强行道德绑架的
他们这里的观点认为扶贫的和当兵也不见得多好，扶贫没有真正的去达到只是个空喊的口号，或者是为了权政至于很多小兵只是被利用的甚至可以说作为一个棋子，有的时候会被用的非常残暴
其实我也很好奇，你是真心来提这些问题，还是伪装的反串？
况且很奇怪的是，你认为这边跟那些搞独立的不是一伙的，但其实这边更多的都是支持独立的。

>> 我想发表帖子提问本人不是粉红五毛是通过悲伤的撒旦游戏中有倒放的我爱北京天安门然后想查询为什么？...

关于品葱在2047和红迪那边以及迷雾通都会有多多少少的争议这边看起来其实也不简单呀2047那边有一个叫支轮功的账号
品葱这边感觉有的时候还是比较危险的或者说类似的论坛多多少少都有点情况和水深的像碟中谍从来观看或者参与的那一刻起就得冒着风险既不能被查到又不能被开盒
想要在这里友好交流的话，感觉不大可能了不是会被当成反串，就是可能会被当成是敌方分子
诡异的是明明很多跟这边也是同样想法的，为什么还会被骂确定骂他的不是水军吗？

已隐藏

我想发表帖子提问
本人不是粉红五毛是通过悲伤的撒旦游戏中有倒放的我爱北京天安门然后想查询为什么？通过问网友了解，只有外网才能知道，又查到了香港97还有维基百科记载的一些事件比如64通过谷歌的搜索引擎检索到了品葱
知道了这些事情之后并不开心，更多的是悲伤和痛苦自己相信的官方竟然真的可能是自己猜想中那样可怕的样子是恶魔，是坏蛋，制造了很多不好的东西
这里的观点有的很激进，但也是情有可原的当一个事物被众多都反对的时候呢就是他本身就有问题
在多次品葱的检索中了解到这里也有当过党员，还有共青团的我的家长目前就是党员他不知道那些痛苦的历史，他也相信官方很好
大多数平民老百姓不是坏，他们根本就没有知道这些的权利，知道了这些也做不了什么
至少这里的观点有的很激进，也不会讨厌全部的华人只是讨厌过分的支性
有一个猛刺的个人网站也有很多反华反共的观点但是太激进了认为民运还有64，还有全球的华人都该死但凡是跟“中国”扯上关系的以及被迫害的法轮功说是这样也是一伙的，而且说做的不对http://cattddog.blogspot.com/2014/05/blog-post_23.html?m=1
很多事情看起来很简单，但是背后牵扯到的关系很深就算反对了的话，会不会也是计划的一环呢
中国不是完全的好坏，但外国也不见得完全完美不然怎么解释？在阴谋论中还有现实中也有美国一些政客的丑闻以及一些公开过的计划实验
在检索信息的过程中，有爆料出神韵表演团https://cn.nytimes.com
我想了解真实的历史真相哪怕最后结局不好，残酷又痛苦南京大屠杀 纳粹 731实验还有核废水和新冠病毒以及缅甸电信诈骗
我不明白为什么会有器官摘除？目的又是什么？因为他们信邪神吗还是为了赚钱？
中国官方为了封锁消息确实很严重不仅是为了统治吧也是需要羊民的但根据更多的消息朝鲜管控更加严格
之前我就被劝过总统都管不着的事情，平民百姓就不要去管了但事实说明主席都会被开盒况且那些丑闻能被爆出来就说明是有证据的恶俗维基虽然揭露了这些事情，但在我看来还是比较恐怖
我只是想了解真相，不想牵扯到我的亲朋好友我也知道你们是知道真相，然后有的被迫害过才会这么做，绝对不是无缘无故
我现在不知道该相信谁或者依赖谁了曾经美好的存在在心里已经变成了这副样子况且很多老百姓都是要上班上学的没那么多钱做到移民啊啥的
而且移民的话或者在外国游玩，有的时候也会有点水土不服，比如日本那边就会吃生肉喝冷水有很多大陆人估计都是不习惯的
然后我还想知道一件事法轮功成员要是有的自己想要退出的话会遭受迫害吗？
我作为一个大陆平民做不出个什么我不会过分的支持或者反对你们的观点但就算跑到外国去进行反抗，记载这些痛苦的历史到如今情况也没有变好，就算推翻了目前的这个政府万一下一个还要坏，那不更可怕吗当然还有说没有政府不就行了但目前查阅到任何的国家好像都没有到无政府的程度
本人是武汉人经历过疫情当时封控的很严重也是在那段时间关于阴谋论的新闻在电视上出现
疫情会让人阳了头晕，无力，难受喉咙也会嘶哑
对于我而言，无论这个新冠是实验室制造的还是其他原因对那些遭受过这些病毒的可怜人们来说都是打击一点都不好

>> 不要被骗了，该网站是境外反动颠覆势力，具有邪恶目的，坚持本心不要被动摇，多观察分辨真相，你有光...

奇怪这条怎么没删？说品葱是共产党开的秒被删，该不会品葱真的是中华人民共和国共产党开的吧

不要被骗了，该网站是境外反动颠覆势力，具有邪恶目的，坚持本心不要被动摇，多观察分辨真相，你有光明正直的人生

已隐藏

已隐藏

已隐藏