川普的和平计画,将使乌克兰极度沮丧

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/11/29/europe/trump-new-ukraine-envoy-analysis-intl?cid=ios_app

其实我早说过了, 乌克兰是欧洲的事情..美国想脱身,重返亚太:

Kellogg says the United States doesn’t need involvement in another conflict, and its own stocks of weaponry have suffered from aiding Ukraine, leaving the country potentially exposed in any conflict with China over Taiwan.

未来美国武器, 用卖的..不是送的
It says future US aid - likely given as a loan

先停战,设置缓冲区...现在被俄罗斯侵占的土地,未来使用外交手段要回
(这已经和司机提的建议一样...看来,这原本是美国的意思, 只是司机妥协了)
The frontlines would be frozen by a ceasefire, and a demilitarized zone imposed. For agreeing to this, Russia would get limited sanctions relief, and full relief only when a peace deal is signed that is to Ukraine’s liking. A levy on Russian energy exports would pay for Ukraine’s reconstruction. Ukraine would not be asked to give up on reclaiming occupied territory, but it would agree to pursue it through diplomacy alone.



不过..别傻了, 只能用外交手段声索, 那就是让乌克兰放弃土地了。

并且, 美国不会让乌克兰入北约的。
至于乌克兰药的安全保障, 美国会让欧洲军队, 自己去驻军帮乌克兰

那如果,欧洲拒绝驻军呢?

讲真..遇到欧洲这种盟友...当初真不如投降了...
https://pomf2.lain.la/f/64qgfj2y.png?width=1381&height=685
6
分享 2024-12-01

42 个评论

[已注销] 回复 献忠王 新注册用户 (待解除)
>> 美国打断中共的战时机制才有用,什么制裁禁运一点用都没有,俄罗斯已经证明了这一点,制裁禁运确实给...

台海南海戰爭拼的不是動員而是科技裝備居多了。不過陸戰沒錯歐美動員力不如中俄朝,而歐洲不願下場的理由就是怕打核戰。與其說動員,不如說誰有勇氣按下相互毀滅的按鈕,狹路相逢毀滅勝,在相互毀滅面前,死70萬跟死70億是沒有差異的

要发言请先登录注册

要发言请先登录注册