川普新採訪: 本來可以很輕鬆說服俄羅斯不打的

週五Fox News對川普的採訪:

Trump sounds off on Zelenskyy amid feud over peace talks: 'I've had it'


打給懶得看視頻的同學:

Trump: …just so you know when you say Russia is the attacker, yes Russia attacked, but there was no reason for them to attack, you could have talked them out of it. There was no reason he was going in, it should have never happened. Every time I say, 'Oh, it's not Russia's fault,' I always get slammed by the fake news. But I'm telling you. Biden said the wrong things. Zelenskyy said the wrong things.

….Russia could have been talked out of that so easily that never should have been a war….
….
so when Zelensky said he was not invited to the meeting…it wasn’t a priority because he did such a bad job in negotiating so far. Number one you shouldn’t have had a war. And if you did it should have been solved and settled immediately….


所以還是怪拜登和澤連司機的嘴炮能力太差不足以忽悠俄羅斯⋯⋯

聽到現在我是真的好奇這位天選之子覺得可以靠什麼忽悠成功俄羅斯不打這個仗,聽上去彷彿點根煙的事。

(另外關於稀土的交易,川普說觀察了很久發現澤連斯基談判時沒有任何籌碼,他已經受夠了。誰知道稀土值多少錢,但至少它還有點價值。)
3
分享 2025-02-21

34 个评论

>> 基因就是不行,不要再嘴硬了,進化需要耐心,靠簇擁那些所謂的名嘴侃政治八卦改變不了你們的基因。或...


杠三小 有哪条法律规定美国总统不得质疑 不可臆测 不准反对的?又不是什么奇怪的宗教团体
民选政客就应该受到监督 总统就应该受到所有人的放大监督
不乐意的大可以回家做他的地产大亨 又没人拿枪顶着要他上
要戴王冠 就别怕得颈椎病 (-᷅_-᷄)

要发言请先登录注册

要发言请先登录注册