马克思是不是打入工人内部的工贼内鬼这一阴谋论？
马克思，落魄小知识分子，类似于毛泽东，本质上是一好吃懒做流氓无产者小知识分子。马克思本来想开一纺织工厂，无奈没有资本。于是幻想做时评家，类似当今百度百科学院出身的键盘侠。
马克思遇上资本家恩格斯，马恩共同看中了工人阶级的潜在力量。他们计划联手干一件大事。
马克思疯狂蛊惑诱骗工人阶级反抗资本家，一定要他们一起灭亡。空手套白狼，一石二鸟。既消灭了资本家，又侵吞了所有资产，把工人阶级降为无产阶级。
马克思和共产党是人贩子，盗跖。党夺权以后，就建立了等级更加严格的官僚主义国家，侵吞了一切财产，把人民打成奴隶。如斯大林、中共。
工人阶级指责共产党背叛革命。就像汉人指责皇太极多尔衮背叛了汉族。羊指责狼忘记初心。
马克思的目的究竟是好的,还是坏的？我越来越感觉共产主义运动是个阴谋.
马克思遇上资本家恩格斯，马恩共同看中了工人阶级的潜在力量。他们计划联手干一件大事。
马克思疯狂蛊惑诱骗工人阶级反抗资本家，一定要他们一起灭亡。空手套白狼，一石二鸟。既消灭了资本家，又侵吞了所有资产，把工人阶级降为无产阶级。
马克思和共产党是人贩子，盗跖。党夺权以后，就建立了等级更加严格的官僚主义国家，侵吞了一切财产，把人民打成奴隶。如斯大林、中共。
工人阶级指责共产党背叛革命。就像汉人指责皇太极多尔衮背叛了汉族。羊指责狼忘记初心。
马克思的目的究竟是好的,还是坏的？我越来越感觉共产主义运动是个阴谋.
工贼Strikebreaker 的意思是那些在罢工时还坚持工作的人。马克思连工人都不是，更没法当工贼了。说他是工贼跟说刘少奇是工贼一样。
马克思确实跟巴枯宁，蒲鲁东，布朗基，拉萨尔，李卜克内西这些冲在一线搞罢工搞群众运动的领袖不一样。人家一支笔，就靠写文章把所有工人运动领袖收服在麾下，让他们心甘情愿拜自己做导师。连加里波第和马志尼都能忽悠进第一国际。这水平不是一般读书人能做到的。到后来甚至很多掌权的贵族都去结交马克思。
说他是内鬼的人并不少。大体分两类，一类是巴枯宁这种和他闹翻的，认为他和犹太人勾结，破坏激进革命的。
“Himself a Jew, Marx has around him, in London and France, but especially in Germany, a multitude of more or less clever, intriguing, mobile, speculating Jews, such as Jews are every where: commercial or banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades, with one foot in the bank, the other in the socialist movement, and with their behinds sitting on the German daily press — they have taken possession of all the newspapers — and you can imagine what kind of sickening literature they produce. Now, this entire Jewish world, which forms a single profiteering sect, a people of blooksuckers, a single gluttonnous parasite, closely and intimately united not only across national borders but across all differences of political opinion — this Jewish world today stands for the most part at the disposal of Marx and at the same time at the disposal of Rothschild. I am certain that Rothschild for his part greatly values the merits of Marx, and that Marx for his part feels instinctive attraction and great respect for Rothschild.
This may seem strange. What can there be in common between Communism and the large banks? Oh! The Communism of Marx seeks enormous centralization in the state, and where such exists, there must inevitably be a central state bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, which. speculates on the work of the people, will always find a way to prevail ....”
另一类是斯宾格勒这种德国民族主义学者，他认为马克思过分亲英，把英国市侩的小商人精神带入了伟大的德国(普鲁士)手工业者的务实的社会主义运动中。
The concepts "bourgeoisie" and "proletariat" reflect the typically English preference for business rather than manual work. (But of course not over mental work. Just as the English intellectual was by choice either a Tory or a Whig, he has had to choose between the two new economic parties. Being a "gentleman", he has naturally opted for big business.) The former is a blessing, the latter a calamity; the one is noble, the other base. But with their hatred the misfortunate ones say, "Business is the evil occupation, manual labor the good." This is the explanation for the mental attitude which gave rise to Marx's social criticism and which has made him so catastrophic for true socialism. He knew the nature of work only from the English viewpoint, as a means of getting rich, as a means lacking in all moral depth. Only success and money, the visible and tangible signs of God’s grace, were of ethical import. The Englishman has no inkling of the dignity of hard work. For him, work is a debasing thing, an ugly necessity. Pity the poor soul who has nothing but work, who owns nothing without more and more work, but who above all will never have wealth in the future! Had Marx understood the meaning of Prussian work, of activity for its own sake, of service in the name of the totality, for "all together" and not for oneself, of duty that ennobles regardless of the kind of work performed—had he been able to comprehend these things, his Manifesto would probably never have been written.
On this matter he was aided by his Jewish instinct, which he himself characterized in his essay on the Jewish question. The curse on physical labor pronounced in the beginning of Genesis, the prohibition against defiling the Sabbath by work—these things made him receptive to the Old Testament pathos of the English sensibility. Hence his hatred of those who do not need to work. The socialism of a Fichte would accuse such people of sloth, it would brand them as irresponsible, dispensable shirkers and parasites. But Marxian instinct envies them. They are too well-off, and therefore they should be revolted against. Marx has inoculated his proletariat with a contempt for work. His fanatical disciples wish to destroy all culture in order to decrease the amount of indispensable work.
马克思确实跟巴枯宁，蒲鲁东，布朗基，拉萨尔，李卜克内西这些冲在一线搞罢工搞群众运动的领袖不一样。人家一支笔，就靠写文章把所有工人运动领袖收服在麾下，让他们心甘情愿拜自己做导师。连加里波第和马志尼都能忽悠进第一国际。这水平不是一般读书人能做到的。到后来甚至很多掌权的贵族都去结交马克思。
说他是内鬼的人并不少。大体分两类，一类是巴枯宁这种和他闹翻的，认为他和犹太人勾结，破坏激进革命的。
“Himself a Jew, Marx has around him, in London and France, but especially in Germany, a multitude of more or less clever, intriguing, mobile, speculating Jews, such as Jews are every where: commercial or banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades, with one foot in the bank, the other in the socialist movement, and with their behinds sitting on the German daily press — they have taken possession of all the newspapers — and you can imagine what kind of sickening literature they produce. Now, this entire Jewish world, which forms a single profiteering sect, a people of blooksuckers, a single gluttonnous parasite, closely and intimately united not only across national borders but across all differences of political opinion — this Jewish world today stands for the most part at the disposal of Marx and at the same time at the disposal of Rothschild. I am certain that Rothschild for his part greatly values the merits of Marx, and that Marx for his part feels instinctive attraction and great respect for Rothschild.
This may seem strange. What can there be in common between Communism and the large banks? Oh! The Communism of Marx seeks enormous centralization in the state, and where such exists, there must inevitably be a central state bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, which. speculates on the work of the people, will always find a way to prevail ....”
另一类是斯宾格勒这种德国民族主义学者，他认为马克思过分亲英，把英国市侩的小商人精神带入了伟大的德国(普鲁士)手工业者的务实的社会主义运动中。
The concepts "bourgeoisie" and "proletariat" reflect the typically English preference for business rather than manual work. (But of course not over mental work. Just as the English intellectual was by choice either a Tory or a Whig, he has had to choose between the two new economic parties. Being a "gentleman", he has naturally opted for big business.) The former is a blessing, the latter a calamity; the one is noble, the other base. But with their hatred the misfortunate ones say, "Business is the evil occupation, manual labor the good." This is the explanation for the mental attitude which gave rise to Marx's social criticism and which has made him so catastrophic for true socialism. He knew the nature of work only from the English viewpoint, as a means of getting rich, as a means lacking in all moral depth. Only success and money, the visible and tangible signs of God’s grace, were of ethical import. The Englishman has no inkling of the dignity of hard work. For him, work is a debasing thing, an ugly necessity. Pity the poor soul who has nothing but work, who owns nothing without more and more work, but who above all will never have wealth in the future! Had Marx understood the meaning of Prussian work, of activity for its own sake, of service in the name of the totality, for "all together" and not for oneself, of duty that ennobles regardless of the kind of work performed—had he been able to comprehend these things, his Manifesto would probably never have been written.
On this matter he was aided by his Jewish instinct, which he himself characterized in his essay on the Jewish question. The curse on physical labor pronounced in the beginning of Genesis, the prohibition against defiling the Sabbath by work—these things made him receptive to the Old Testament pathos of the English sensibility. Hence his hatred of those who do not need to work. The socialism of a Fichte would accuse such people of sloth, it would brand them as irresponsible, dispensable shirkers and parasites. But Marxian instinct envies them. They are too well-off, and therefore they should be revolted against. Marx has inoculated his proletariat with a contempt for work. His fanatical disciples wish to destroy all culture in order to decrease the amount of indispensable work.
蠢貨哪有什麽目的
真要誘騙工人，在世的時候就應該想辦法把自己塑造成教主形象。斯大林當權了，對馬克思有什麽好處？
再説早年紅匪騙得最多的，就是一些讀了一點書但都沒讀好的知識分子，只會半吊子社會學而不懂生物學一個字的家夥們，不然就是學生
工人還是次要的
真要誘騙工人，在世的時候就應該想辦法把自己塑造成教主形象。斯大林當權了，對馬克思有什麽好處？
再説早年紅匪騙得最多的，就是一些讀了一點書但都沒讀好的知識分子，只會半吊子社會學而不懂生物學一個字的家夥們，不然就是學生
工人還是次要的
额，你知道啥叫“无产阶级”吗？你家工人有生产资料？工人阶级不就是无产阶级？
厉害厉害，连马克思都被开除共籍了，毕竟没有真正的共产主义
结论倒是正确无比，共产主义本来就是个阴谋，没有任何可行性存在
结论倒是正确无比，共产主义本来就是个阴谋，没有任何可行性存在
