已删除
7 个评论
没事，这些汉奸善于倒打一耙，把少民还手冠上什么回乱之类的，这样就可以名正言顺在朝廷立功了
tongusoroqen
新注册用户 (待解除)
当年老毛，太君，还有满鞑屠三又还是屠少了。多屠一屠就没这么多逼事了。
大家发现没，自从十二月以来，献忠似乎一下子被按了暂停键，听不见了。难道真是习包子的“治理”立竿见影出成效了？鬼扯。
前些天这里有网友解释说：献还在继续开，只是被“各级干部”瞒报了，封锁了，警情通报不准再提了。下面用这手骗习包子，说“治理（习包最爱的两个字）”出成效了。包子也乐得被骗，图个清净。
这个解释似乎合理，但推特上现在也搜不到这些个消息了。莫非习共把推特也收买了，不让发献忠通报了？如果连海外舆论都被土共操控成这样，那真是太可悲、可叹、又可笑了。
前些天这里有网友解释说：献还在继续开，只是被“各级干部”瞒报了，封锁了，警情通报不准再提了。下面用这手骗习包子，说“治理（习包最爱的两个字）”出成效了。包子也乐得被骗，图个清净。
这个解释似乎合理，但推特上现在也搜不到这些个消息了。莫非习共把推特也收买了，不让发献忠通报了？如果连海外舆论都被土共操控成这样，那真是太可悲、可叹、又可笑了。
早在六十年前，大汉恐怖分子就会拿刀砍大使馆，大闹苏联红场
在這個清單中有些算是極端主義或者恐怖事件。而有些國家官方的定義不一定一樣。
內容概要：
Terrorism and extremism are sometimes used interchangeably. Both pose a threat to students(這裡按普通人好了) but they have very distinct definitions.
Terrorism is an action or threat designed to influence the government or intimidate the public. Its purpose is to advance a political, religious or ideological cause. The current UK definition of terrorism is given in the Terrorism Act 2006.
In the UK we define terrorism as a violent action that:
How does terrorism differ from extremism
On 14 March 2024 the government announced a new definition of extremism that says:
“Extremism is the promotion or advancement of an ideology based on violence, hatred or intolerance, that aims to:
(1) negate or destroy the fundamental rights and freedoms of others; or
(2) undermine, overturn or replace the UK’s system of liberal parliamentary democracy and democratic rights; or
(3) intentionally create a permissive environment for others to achieve the results in (1) or (2).”
This updated definition of extremism will be used by government departments and officials alongside a set of engagement principles, to ensure Government is not inadvertently providing a platform, funding or legitimacy to groups or individuals who attempt to advance extremist ideologies.
Currently, The scope of the definition and principles is UK ministerial central government departments only, so the Department for Education (DfE) are not asking any education settings to adopt the definition or apply the principles.
Instead, schools should continue to follow existing statutory guidance on safeguarding and the Prevent Duty and implement their policies in the same way.
The DfE will be reviewing existing guidance to account for the recent announcement in due course to consider changes.
Schools and colleges should also actively promote fundamental British values
Schools and colleges are also required to actively promote the fundamental British values of democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and mutual respect and tolerance for those of different faiths and beliefs. Ofsted inspects how well schools and colleges promote these values.
It’s important to remember that not all extremist groups, whether Islamist, extreme right-wing, mixed and unclear ideologies, or other, will commit terrorist or violent acts. However, some groups pose particular threats, both online and offline.
全文 https://www.educateagainsthate.com/terrorism-definition/
Restorative Justice
「修復式司法」（Restorative Justice，或譯為「修復式正義」）一詞雖然自1970年代才被學者提出並倡議，其理念、作法其實源自許多地區與社會的原住民族處理人際衝突的智慧。而聯合國經濟與社會委員會於2002年研擬公布「刑事案件中使用修復式司法方案之基本原則」中，指出「修復式司法方案」是指採用修復式程序，啟動加害人與被害人對話修復的機制。由此可知，「修復式司法」指的是進入司法體系的刑事案件所採行的修復措施。
國際復和實踐機構（International Institute for Restorative Practices, IIRP）選擇使用「修復式實踐」（Restorative Practices）來泛指可運用於司法、校園、職場與軍隊等場域衝突事件的修復式作為。這說明使用「修復式正義」或「修復式實踐」概念來指稱加害人與被害人對話修復的機制，或許涵蓋面向可以更廣。
訓練有素的修復促進者在其中扮演非常重要的角色，「傾聽就是最好的安慰」，「『套話』不是你的職責所在」，「不要太多封閉性問題、下評論，不要代替他們發言、不給建議，也別試圖改變他們，只有傾聽、接納，無條件的接納」等，都是修復促進者在《那些受傷的臉孔》劇情中接受訓練時所聽到的箴言。因為「修復式司法」是一場格鬥運動，在加害者與飽受心理創傷的被害人之間搭建起對話橋梁，必須非常小心謹慎。
https://www.twreporter.org/a/saturday-features-legal-profession-drama-all-your-faces
修復式司法－心靈創傷的縫補師：訪談篇(國語)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzudXu5NLl0
修復式司法－心靈創傷的縫補師：被害人角度篇(國語)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vgimpi1vYz0
修復式司法－心靈創傷的縫補師：加害人角度篇(國語)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDbVpYFDqnY
沒有轉型正義的教育，很容易誤傷無辜：
台灣研究生為何到印度教流亡藏人「敵人的語言」？《桑和朵瑪》的反思手記
https://www.twreporter.org/a/bookreview-bsangs-and-gtor-ma
內容概要：
- Terrorism and extremism
- Restorative Justice
- 修復式司法在台灣（被害者和加害者）
- 台灣研究生為何到印度教流亡藏人「敵人的語言」？《桑和朵瑪》的反思手記
Terrorism and extremism are sometimes used interchangeably. Both pose a threat to students(這裡按普通人好了) but they have very distinct definitions.
Terrorism is an action or threat designed to influence the government or intimidate the public. Its purpose is to advance a political, religious or ideological cause. The current UK definition of terrorism is given in the Terrorism Act 2006.
In the UK we define terrorism as a violent action that:
- Endangers a person’s life, other than that of the person committing the action
- Involves serious violence against a person
- Causes serious damage to property
- Creates a serious risk to the public’s health and safety
- Interferes with or seriously disrupts an electronic system
How does terrorism differ from extremism
On 14 March 2024 the government announced a new definition of extremism that says:
“Extremism is the promotion or advancement of an ideology based on violence, hatred or intolerance, that aims to:
(1) negate or destroy the fundamental rights and freedoms of others; or
(2) undermine, overturn or replace the UK’s system of liberal parliamentary democracy and democratic rights; or
(3) intentionally create a permissive environment for others to achieve the results in (1) or (2).”
This updated definition of extremism will be used by government departments and officials alongside a set of engagement principles, to ensure Government is not inadvertently providing a platform, funding or legitimacy to groups or individuals who attempt to advance extremist ideologies.
Currently, The scope of the definition and principles is UK ministerial central government departments only, so the Department for Education (DfE) are not asking any education settings to adopt the definition or apply the principles.
Instead, schools should continue to follow existing statutory guidance on safeguarding and the Prevent Duty and implement their policies in the same way.
The DfE will be reviewing existing guidance to account for the recent announcement in due course to consider changes.
Schools and colleges should also actively promote fundamental British values
Schools and colleges are also required to actively promote the fundamental British values of democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and mutual respect and tolerance for those of different faiths and beliefs. Ofsted inspects how well schools and colleges promote these values.
It’s important to remember that not all extremist groups, whether Islamist, extreme right-wing, mixed and unclear ideologies, or other, will commit terrorist or violent acts. However, some groups pose particular threats, both online and offline.
全文 https://www.educateagainsthate.com/terrorism-definition/
Restorative Justice
「修復式司法」（Restorative Justice，或譯為「修復式正義」）一詞雖然自1970年代才被學者提出並倡議，其理念、作法其實源自許多地區與社會的原住民族處理人際衝突的智慧。而聯合國經濟與社會委員會於2002年研擬公布「刑事案件中使用修復式司法方案之基本原則」中，指出「修復式司法方案」是指採用修復式程序，啟動加害人與被害人對話修復的機制。由此可知，「修復式司法」指的是進入司法體系的刑事案件所採行的修復措施。
國際復和實踐機構（International Institute for Restorative Practices, IIRP）選擇使用「修復式實踐」（Restorative Practices）來泛指可運用於司法、校園、職場與軍隊等場域衝突事件的修復式作為。這說明使用「修復式正義」或「修復式實踐」概念來指稱加害人與被害人對話修復的機制，或許涵蓋面向可以更廣。
訓練有素的修復促進者在其中扮演非常重要的角色，「傾聽就是最好的安慰」，「『套話』不是你的職責所在」，「不要太多封閉性問題、下評論，不要代替他們發言、不給建議，也別試圖改變他們，只有傾聽、接納，無條件的接納」等，都是修復促進者在《那些受傷的臉孔》劇情中接受訓練時所聽到的箴言。因為「修復式司法」是一場格鬥運動，在加害者與飽受心理創傷的被害人之間搭建起對話橋梁，必須非常小心謹慎。
https://www.twreporter.org/a/saturday-features-legal-profession-drama-all-your-faces
修復式司法－心靈創傷的縫補師：訪談篇(國語)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzudXu5NLl0
修復式司法－心靈創傷的縫補師：被害人角度篇(國語)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vgimpi1vYz0
修復式司法－心靈創傷的縫補師：加害人角度篇(國語)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDbVpYFDqnY
沒有轉型正義的教育，很容易誤傷無辜：
台灣研究生為何到印度教流亡藏人「敵人的語言」？《桑和朵瑪》的反思手記
https://www.twreporter.org/a/bookreview-bsangs-and-gtor-ma
在流亡西藏社群中，中文或者漢語，有很長一段時間被視為是「敵對陣營」的語言。我們所訓練的9名學員老師，作為一名流亡藏人而成為漢語教師，他們必須承擔民族主義思想造成的壓力。
你这个并不全面
因为今年中国每个月的每一天，全国各地平均起码有1起甚至更多献忠
因为今年中国每个月的每一天，全国各地平均起码有1起甚至更多献忠
tongusoroqen
新注册用户 (待解除)
你国确实是像刘仲敬说的一样，是人类洼地。开个车撞人，拿刀砍个人，就算恐怖分子了。隔壁爱尔兰共和军都是开着装甲车和武装直升机和英国佬对着干。