Is there any significant difference between Chinese and HKers?
admin同我講用英文發言, 因為我的輸入法好難寫普通話, 我用英文大抵不會被禁言?
I just see this comment in a telegram channel of Zhina wiki, the doxxing wikipedia that doxxed the first shooter at the Anti-Extradition protest. It says
Link here https://telegram/realZhinawiki/1005
My question here is whether there is any significant difference between Chinese in general and HKer, because the comment it made was poignant towards Chinese. I believe a lot of HKers would be agree to this.
I just see this comment in a telegram channel of Zhina wiki, the doxxing wikipedia that doxxed the first shooter at the Anti-Extradition protest. It says
最後警告，謝絕支那人藉機沾港人嘅光，人哋質素高係因為人哋質素高，句號。同你哋大中華文化乜鳩事情都無你知嗎
Link here https://telegram/realZhinawiki/1005
My question here is whether there is any significant difference between Chinese in general and HKer, because the comment it made was poignant towards Chinese. I believe a lot of HKers would be agree to this.
Hi there.
First of all, we shouldn't make assumptions on a large group of people based on one single Twitter comment.
I'm sure you've heard of the government firewall in mainland China. It blocks most foreign websites (if we count traffic instead of numbers). Because of that, most of the Mainlanders on Twitter fall into the following two categories.
-- Commentators paid by the Chinese government. AKA "五毛党".
They are the mouthpiece of the Party. However, they are not always supporting the Party in a straight forward way. You can Google "网评员培训资料" and see their strategies to, let's be frank, brainwash people. That includes but not limited to pretending to be someone from other countries (see that weird surname in "Emily Sophia"?), digressing in a discussion, and pretending to belong to the next category.
-- Those that use VPN or other ways to use Twitter on their own.
Because the Great Firewall has been upgrading fast, it has become more and more difficult to get across it. People who are able to do that are either tech-savvy, or willing put in the effort to access the real internet. That means they're intelligent and have a sense for freedom.
It should be obvious that the above two types of people often hold opposing opinions. It should also be obvious that these people are not the majority of Chinese netizens trapped behind the wall; it's a much larger group of people. Chinese netizens are also not all of Chinese citizens; it's a even larger group of people.
Back to your question whether there is any significant difference between Chinese in general and HKer.
Yes. Chinese in general would admit they're brainwashed. However, it is a fact that they live in a brainwashing media environment. It is also a fact that the ability to think and reason is influenced by what one reads and hears. Do the math yourself.
If you are counting on the Chinese in general to support HK. Here's my warning:
DO NOT COUNT ON IT!!! HK MUST FIGHT!!!
不要心存侥幸！大陆政府控制着所有人，包括他们的思想。
香港，让我为你再唱一次七子之歌，然后，你快逃吧。
First of all, we shouldn't make assumptions on a large group of people based on one single Twitter comment.
I'm sure you've heard of the government firewall in mainland China. It blocks most foreign websites (if we count traffic instead of numbers). Because of that, most of the Mainlanders on Twitter fall into the following two categories.
-- Commentators paid by the Chinese government. AKA "五毛党".
They are the mouthpiece of the Party. However, they are not always supporting the Party in a straight forward way. You can Google "网评员培训资料" and see their strategies to, let's be frank, brainwash people. That includes but not limited to pretending to be someone from other countries (see that weird surname in "Emily Sophia"?), digressing in a discussion, and pretending to belong to the next category.
-- Those that use VPN or other ways to use Twitter on their own.
Because the Great Firewall has been upgrading fast, it has become more and more difficult to get across it. People who are able to do that are either tech-savvy, or willing put in the effort to access the real internet. That means they're intelligent and have a sense for freedom.
It should be obvious that the above two types of people often hold opposing opinions. It should also be obvious that these people are not the majority of Chinese netizens trapped behind the wall; it's a much larger group of people. Chinese netizens are also not all of Chinese citizens; it's a even larger group of people.
Back to your question whether there is any significant difference between Chinese in general and HKer.
Yes. Chinese in general would admit they're brainwashed. However, it is a fact that they live in a brainwashing media environment. It is also a fact that the ability to think and reason is influenced by what one reads and hears. Do the math yourself.
If you are counting on the Chinese in general to support HK. Here's my warning:
DO NOT COUNT ON IT!!! HK MUST FIGHT!!!
不要心存侥幸！大陆政府控制着所有人，包括他们的思想。
香港，让我为你再唱一次七子之歌，然后，你快逃吧。
沒有，我在我的生活環境裡遇到過一些英文比我好的中國人。
畢竟你的問題指全部的中國人，那麼我只能回答中國有15億人，你不能generalization這麼多人。 你應該明白香港真的很小，所以香港人的價值觀其實相對很多地方已經統一非常多了。 甚至跟新加坡比，新加坡非單一種族。
還有你用粵語這裡沒人看的懂。
畢竟你的問題指全部的中國人，那麼我只能回答中國有15億人，你不能generalization這麼多人。 你應該明白香港真的很小，所以香港人的價值觀其實相對很多地方已經統一非常多了。 甚至跟新加坡比，新加坡非單一種族。
還有你用粵語這裡沒人看的懂。
如果中國不解體，沒有區別。我非常理解香港人不想做中國人的心情。新疆人、西藏人也不想做中國人。
香港人，如果你們拒絕看清楚共產極權的本質，而僅僅將中港看得見的差異歸因於大陸人的問題，那你們是在跟風車戰鬥，遲早會被真正的敵人吞沒。
HKers, if you refuse to understand the essence of communist totalitarianism, but only attribute the difference between China and Hong Kong to the mainland people's problems, then you are fighting the windmill, and sooner or later will be engulfed by the real enemy.
HKers, if you refuse to understand the essence of communist totalitarianism, but only attribute the difference between China and Hong Kong to the mainland people's problems, then you are fighting the windmill, and sooner or later will be engulfed by the real enemy.
