【福利】最不可信和最可信的新闻源(英文)
Trusting News Project Report 2017
A Reynolds Journalism Institute research project
Michael W. Kearney
2017-07-25
俗话说吃什么就是什么，如果你天天看小道消息+朋友圈转发，观点和视野注定受限。
最不可信和最可信的新闻源
新闻源的意识形态倾向
A Reynolds Journalism Institute research project
Michael W. Kearney
2017-07-25
俗话说吃什么就是什么，如果你天天看小道消息+朋友圈转发，观点和视野注定受限。
最不可信和最可信的新闻源
新闻源的意识形态倾向
11 个评论
这个评测我一个像素都不信
这篇文章把英国媒体捧得太高了吧？
ps我觉得breitbart.com才是最靠谱的。
ps我觉得breitbart.com才是最靠谱的。
特朗普也列进去是什么意思？这个打分倾向性太高了，我不相信。
不认识极左媒体？Buzzfeed、Occupy democrats、赫芬顿以及大部分主流媒体都在“不信任”那一边，另一边全是中右（除了BBC、NYT和卫报）
这是美国读者的满意度调查吧，怎么看都不像客观的“真实可信”评测。
Infowars可信度居然高于特朗普，就算再大嘴巴也总比谣言阴谋论聚集地可信吧。外国媒体也不正常的高，是不是因为受众少+“旁观者清”啊
Infowars可信度居然高于特朗普，就算再大嘴巴也总比谣言阴谋论聚集地可信吧。外国媒体也不正常的高，是不是因为受众少+“旁观者清”啊
atlantic 有些地方扭曲的特別誇張，不知道為什麼
既然川普喜歡發帖，推特官方又和川普做對，為什麼不成立一個新網絡媒體
题主的标题以及内容都有误导性质。
我援引下原文给出的调查方法：
Data collection
Data were collected in the February and March 2017 using an online survey made available to users (N = 8,728) of the digital media platforms of twenty-eight different newsrooms across the United States. Newsrooms included were Annenberg Media, Ball State Daily News, Casper Star-Tribune, Cincinnati Enquirer, Coloradoan, Columbia Missourian, Dallas Morning News, Denver Post, Evergrey, Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Fresno Bee, Jacksboro, Herald-Gazette, Kansas City Star, KUT, Lima News, Minneapolis Star Tribune, NBC, Ogden Standard-Examiner, Rains County Leader, San Angelo Standard-Times, Skagit Publishing, Springfield News-Leader, St. Louis Magazine, St. Louis Public Radio, Steamboat Pilot & Today, USA TODAY, WCPO, and WDET. Participation was strictly voluntary—no compensation was provided. Most newsrooms made reference to the survey on their websites and social media accounts. Some mentioned it in print and on air. For the most part, the survey was made available by newsrooms around the same time. However, the duration and level of participation did vary, as will be addressed below.
从上面这段可以看出，这是一个针对普通网友的”民调“，所得出的结果只代表这些受访用户的意见，不等于该媒体的内容真实度。所以媒体得分来源于价值观类似，或者长期订阅观看的用户(众所周知，目前中天是除央视外可信度几乎最低的华语主流媒体。如果让台湾中天的忠实观众/读者们参与类似民调，他们一定把票都投给中天，甚至会超过很多相对可信度更高一些的媒体。这是否意味着中天的可信度高过这些被它超过的媒体呢？)
PS:我个人认为，这个调查与其说是媒体可信度调查，不如说是各大媒体用户数量以及价值观/兴趣取向的调查
我援引下原文给出的调查方法：
Data collection
Data were collected in the February and March 2017 using an online survey made available to users (N = 8,728) of the digital media platforms of twenty-eight different newsrooms across the United States. Newsrooms included were Annenberg Media, Ball State Daily News, Casper Star-Tribune, Cincinnati Enquirer, Coloradoan, Columbia Missourian, Dallas Morning News, Denver Post, Evergrey, Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Fresno Bee, Jacksboro, Herald-Gazette, Kansas City Star, KUT, Lima News, Minneapolis Star Tribune, NBC, Ogden Standard-Examiner, Rains County Leader, San Angelo Standard-Times, Skagit Publishing, Springfield News-Leader, St. Louis Magazine, St. Louis Public Radio, Steamboat Pilot & Today, USA TODAY, WCPO, and WDET. Participation was strictly voluntary—no compensation was provided. Most newsrooms made reference to the survey on their websites and social media accounts. Some mentioned it in print and on air. For the most part, the survey was made available by newsrooms around the same time. However, the duration and level of participation did vary, as will be addressed below.
从上面这段可以看出，这是一个针对普通网友的”民调“，所得出的结果只代表这些受访用户的意见，不等于该媒体的内容真实度。所以媒体得分来源于价值观类似，或者长期订阅观看的用户(众所周知，目前中天是除央视外可信度几乎最低的华语主流媒体。如果让台湾中天的忠实观众/读者们参与类似民调，他们一定把票都投给中天，甚至会超过很多相对可信度更高一些的媒体。这是否意味着中天的可信度高过这些被它超过的媒体呢？)
PS:我个人认为，这个调查与其说是媒体可信度调查，不如说是各大媒体用户数量以及价值观/兴趣取向的调查
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/
這個網站還可信得多
這個網站還可信得多
这种左左“民调”从Trump竞选开始，2016年那时什么70%反对30%支持，Hillary 90%赞同率的“民调”等等要多少有多少。结果16年底的大选如何呢？呵呵
另外那个意识排行，Dec Now, Guardian, NY, NYT, WP, NPR, 居然是偏中立/无倾向？笑掉大牙哈哈
另外那个意识排行，Dec Now, Guardian, NY, NYT, WP, NPR, 居然是偏中立/无倾向？笑掉大牙哈哈