右翼分子吐槽扯淡专楼
"The defense of individual rights has reached such extremes as to make society as a whole defenseless against certain individuals. It is time, in the West, to defend not so much human rights as human obligations.
On the other hand, destructive and irresponsible freedom has been granted boundless space. Society has turned out to have scarce defense against the abyss of human decadence, for example against the misuse of liberty for moral violence against young people, such as motion pictures full of pornography, crime, and horror. This is all considered to be part of freedom and to be counterbalanced, in theory, by the young people’s right not to look and not to accept. Life organized legalistically has thus shown its inability to defend itself against the corrosion of evil.
......
This tilt of freedom toward evil has come about gradually, but it evidently stems from a humanistic and benevolent concept according to which man—the master of this world—does not bear any evil within himself, and all the defects of life are caused by misguided social systems, which must therefore be corrected."
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Harvard Commencement Address ("A World Split Apart"), June 8, 1978
On the other hand, destructive and irresponsible freedom has been granted boundless space. Society has turned out to have scarce defense against the abyss of human decadence, for example against the misuse of liberty for moral violence against young people, such as motion pictures full of pornography, crime, and horror. This is all considered to be part of freedom and to be counterbalanced, in theory, by the young people’s right not to look and not to accept. Life organized legalistically has thus shown its inability to defend itself against the corrosion of evil.
......
This tilt of freedom toward evil has come about gradually, but it evidently stems from a humanistic and benevolent concept according to which man—the master of this world—does not bear any evil within himself, and all the defects of life are caused by misguided social systems, which must therefore be corrected."
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Harvard Commencement Address ("A World Split Apart"), June 8, 1978
1473 个评论
你姨在回答是否应该补偿黑奴后代时，痛批文化进步派，相当精彩：
“无论黑人还是白人，法国人还是德国人，基督徒还是穆斯林，他们都是文明社会的建构者，只有共产国际才是文明社会的解构者和破坏者。为什么对文明人和文明人、好人和好人相互之间由于自然的自私造成的破坏抓住不放，却对真正的社会公敌和反社会分子造成的破坏视而不见呢？”
但是要注意到，这里的歧视链不以国别界定，而是以意识形态为单位。主张补偿黑奴后代的文化进步派坐落在意识形态歧视链的最底端，是所有愿意维护文明的其他意识形态共同防范的对象。意识形态歧视链和国家歧视链是不重合的，你姨把当今文化进步派归为共产国际的后裔，然而共产主义并不源自国家歧视链的底端，也就是远东洼地。它起源于国家歧视链相对较高的地方，德国。因此以下形式的推理，即便根据歧视链学本身，也会不时犯错误：“某意识形态/观念/制度A源于甲国，另一意识形态/观念/制度B源于乙国，因为甲国在国家歧视链上高于乙国，所以A在歧视链上高于B”。
我们可以进一步质问，文化进步派是否真能归为共产国际的后裔？今天他们的各项主张有多少可以从共产主义的原教旨中推导出来？把他们看作自由主义的后裔是否更合理，更能得到一套严密历史叙事的支持？更具体地问，在当今进步主义的文献中，有多少贡献可以归于美国之外的思想家，有多少是美国人在自由主义平台之上的自发创造？所有这些问题的答案，我相信都指向一个貌似悖谬的结论：当今歧视链最底端的意识形态，绽放于歧视链顶端的国家。欧洲人虽然接受美国领导，却对美国学术界兜售的各种社会理论越来越警惕，正是这个矛盾的反映。以上结论中的悖谬以黑格尔主义的视角看其实完全合理：文明最腐败的花朵只有在文明兴盛到糜烂的生态中才能吐露芬芳。
“无论黑人还是白人，法国人还是德国人，基督徒还是穆斯林，他们都是文明社会的建构者，只有共产国际才是文明社会的解构者和破坏者。为什么对文明人和文明人、好人和好人相互之间由于自然的自私造成的破坏抓住不放，却对真正的社会公敌和反社会分子造成的破坏视而不见呢？”
但是要注意到，这里的歧视链不以国别界定，而是以意识形态为单位。主张补偿黑奴后代的文化进步派坐落在意识形态歧视链的最底端，是所有愿意维护文明的其他意识形态共同防范的对象。意识形态歧视链和国家歧视链是不重合的，你姨把当今文化进步派归为共产国际的后裔，然而共产主义并不源自国家歧视链的底端，也就是远东洼地。它起源于国家歧视链相对较高的地方，德国。因此以下形式的推理，即便根据歧视链学本身，也会不时犯错误：“某意识形态/观念/制度A源于甲国，另一意识形态/观念/制度B源于乙国，因为甲国在国家歧视链上高于乙国，所以A在歧视链上高于B”。
我们可以进一步质问，文化进步派是否真能归为共产国际的后裔？今天他们的各项主张有多少可以从共产主义的原教旨中推导出来？把他们看作自由主义的后裔是否更合理，更能得到一套严密历史叙事的支持？更具体地问，在当今进步主义的文献中，有多少贡献可以归于美国之外的思想家，有多少是美国人在自由主义平台之上的自发创造？所有这些问题的答案，我相信都指向一个貌似悖谬的结论：当今歧视链最底端的意识形态，绽放于歧视链顶端的国家。欧洲人虽然接受美国领导，却对美国学术界兜售的各种社会理论越来越警惕，正是这个矛盾的反映。以上结论中的悖谬以黑格尔主义的视角看其实完全合理：文明最腐败的花朵只有在文明兴盛到糜烂的生态中才能吐露芬芳。