维基百科繁体中文还可不可靠？
简体中文被渗透的很严重，繁体中文应该没那么严重吧
这两个版本的维基百科内容除了字体以外内容都差不多。看英文维基是最好的选择。
不可靠，刚去粗略对比了一下中英文维基百科的64词条。
光是这一个词条，中文维基就删除了伤亡数字、国际社会、人权组织和政治分析家谴责还有关于该事件造成的审查影响，还有深刻分析的段落。
而且中文维基用词语法和国内媒体很相似。
伤亡数字，英文：
On the morning of June 4, many estimates of deaths were reported, including from CCP-affiliated sources. Peking University leaflets circulated on campus suggested a death toll of between two and three thousand. The Chinese Red Cross had given a figure of 2,600 deaths, but later denied having given such a figure.[sup][2][/sup][sup][3][/sup] The Swiss Ambassador had estimated 2,700.[sup][4][/sup] Nicholas D. Kristof of The New York Times wrote on June 21 that "it seems plausible that about a dozen soldiers and policemen were killed, along with 400 to 800 civilians."[sup][5][/sup] United States ambassador James Lilley said that, based on visits to hospitals around Beijing, a minimum of several hundred had been killed.[sup][202][/sup] A declassified National Security Agency cable filed on the same day estimated 180–500 deaths up to the morning of June 4.[sup][146][/sup] Beijing hospital records compiled shortly after the events recorded at least 478 dead and 920 wounded.[sup][203][/sup] Amnesty International's estimates put the number of deaths at between several hundred and close to 1,000,[sup][2][/sup][sup][7][/sup] while a Western diplomat who compiled estimates put the number at 300 to 1,000.[sup][5][/sup] In a widely reported 2017-declassified cable sent in the aftermath of the events at Tiananmen, British Ambassador Sir Alan Donald initially claimed, based on information from a "good friend" in the China State Council, that a minimum of 10,000 civilians died,[sup][204][/sup] an estimated number much higher than other sources provided.[sup][205][/sup] After this declassification, former student protest leader Feng Congde pointed out that Sir Donald later revised his estimate to 2,700–3,400 deaths, a number more consistent with other estimates.[sup][206][/sup]
中文：
1989年6月6日，中华人民共和国国务院官员召开新闻发表会，发言人袁木表示“初步统计”包括部队士兵、大学学生、非法分子和误杀群众在内，有近300人死亡[sup][319][/sup][sup][320][/sup]。
英文维基关于64事件后中国国际形象变化的描述：
The Chinese government drew widespread condemnation for its suppression of the protests. In the immediate aftermath, China seemed to be becoming a pariah state, increasingly isolated internationally. This was a significant setback for the leadership, who had courted international investment for much of the 1980s, as the country emerged from the chaos of the Cultural Revolution. However, Deng Xiaoping and the core leadership vowed to continue economic liberalization policies after 1989.[sup][262][/sup] From there on, China would work domestically as well as internationally to reshape its national image from that of a repressive regime to that of a benign global economic and military partner.[sup][263][/sup]
光是这一个词条，中文维基就删除了伤亡数字、国际社会、人权组织和政治分析家谴责还有关于该事件造成的审查影响，还有深刻分析的段落。
而且中文维基用词语法和国内媒体很相似。
伤亡数字，英文：
On the morning of June 4, many estimates of deaths were reported, including from CCP-affiliated sources. Peking University leaflets circulated on campus suggested a death toll of between two and three thousand. The Chinese Red Cross had given a figure of 2,600 deaths, but later denied having given such a figure.[sup][2][/sup][sup][3][/sup] The Swiss Ambassador had estimated 2,700.[sup][4][/sup] Nicholas D. Kristof of The New York Times wrote on June 21 that "it seems plausible that about a dozen soldiers and policemen were killed, along with 400 to 800 civilians."[sup][5][/sup] United States ambassador James Lilley said that, based on visits to hospitals around Beijing, a minimum of several hundred had been killed.[sup][202][/sup] A declassified National Security Agency cable filed on the same day estimated 180–500 deaths up to the morning of June 4.[sup][146][/sup] Beijing hospital records compiled shortly after the events recorded at least 478 dead and 920 wounded.[sup][203][/sup] Amnesty International's estimates put the number of deaths at between several hundred and close to 1,000,[sup][2][/sup][sup][7][/sup] while a Western diplomat who compiled estimates put the number at 300 to 1,000.[sup][5][/sup] In a widely reported 2017-declassified cable sent in the aftermath of the events at Tiananmen, British Ambassador Sir Alan Donald initially claimed, based on information from a "good friend" in the China State Council, that a minimum of 10,000 civilians died,[sup][204][/sup] an estimated number much higher than other sources provided.[sup][205][/sup] After this declassification, former student protest leader Feng Congde pointed out that Sir Donald later revised his estimate to 2,700–3,400 deaths, a number more consistent with other estimates.[sup][206][/sup]
中文：
1989年6月6日，中华人民共和国国务院官员召开新闻发表会，发言人袁木表示“初步统计”包括部队士兵、大学学生、非法分子和误杀群众在内，有近300人死亡[sup][319][/sup][sup][320][/sup]。
英文维基关于64事件后中国国际形象变化的描述：
The Chinese government drew widespread condemnation for its suppression of the protests. In the immediate aftermath, China seemed to be becoming a pariah state, increasingly isolated internationally. This was a significant setback for the leadership, who had courted international investment for much of the 1980s, as the country emerged from the chaos of the Cultural Revolution. However, Deng Xiaoping and the core leadership vowed to continue economic liberalization policies after 1989.[sup][262][/sup] From there on, China would work domestically as well as internationally to reshape its national image from that of a repressive regime to that of a benign global economic and military partner.[sup][263][/sup]
維基百科的價值在於 Reference，如果不會自己核實資料來源的話不管什麼語言的維基百科都不可靠。
楼主是没怎么用过维基吗？现在各种支文变体都归到一类了。建议还是看英文的
維基百科被滲透的太嚴重了，很多與共匪跟中國相關的詞條都被親共人士修改了，很多重要的詞條都是運用親共人士的觀點解釋的。
不清楚樓主背景，但試試在學術著作直接cite wiki?導師應該想抽飛你呢。
如果只想以最快速度對不熟悉領域有大致印象，wiki很好用，但如果要準確資料甚或要深入研究，wiki最多只能拿reference啓發一下。
如果只想以最快速度對不熟悉領域有大致印象，wiki很好用，但如果要準確資料甚或要深入研究，wiki最多只能拿reference啓發一下。
可不可靠?
樓主有注意過就算是繁體中文的維基百科，
要是他的來源要是來自中共國媒體，
那中共國的媒體需不需要中共的黨國審查?
中共都審查過的資料，還可不可靠 ?
就像維基百科的"中英聯合聲明"一樣，
加入中共說法就像一則笑話，呵呵;
很重要~
注意來源~
注意來源~
注意來源~
說三次，
你才知道這個資料可不可靠。
樓主有注意過就算是繁體中文的維基百科，
要是他的來源要是來自中共國媒體，
那中共國的媒體需不需要中共的黨國審查?
中共都審查過的資料，還可不可靠 ?
就像維基百科的"中英聯合聲明"一樣，
加入中共說法就像一則笑話，呵呵;
很重要~
注意來源~
注意來源~
注意來源~
說三次，
你才知道這個資料可不可靠。