右翼分子吐槽扯淡专楼
"The defense of individual rights has reached such extremes as to make society as a whole defenseless against certain individuals. It is time, in the West, to defend not so much human rights as human obligations.
On the other hand, destructive and irresponsible freedom has been granted boundless space. Society has turned out to have scarce defense against the abyss of human decadence, for example against the misuse of liberty for moral violence against young people, such as motion pictures full of pornography, crime, and horror. This is all considered to be part of freedom and to be counterbalanced, in theory, by the young people’s right not to look and not to accept. Life organized legalistically has thus shown its inability to defend itself against the corrosion of evil.
......
This tilt of freedom toward evil has come about gradually, but it evidently stems from a humanistic and benevolent concept according to which man—the master of this world—does not bear any evil within himself, and all the defects of life are caused by misguided social systems, which must therefore be corrected."
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Harvard Commencement Address ("A World Split Apart"), June 8, 1978
On the other hand, destructive and irresponsible freedom has been granted boundless space. Society has turned out to have scarce defense against the abyss of human decadence, for example against the misuse of liberty for moral violence against young people, such as motion pictures full of pornography, crime, and horror. This is all considered to be part of freedom and to be counterbalanced, in theory, by the young people’s right not to look and not to accept. Life organized legalistically has thus shown its inability to defend itself against the corrosion of evil.
......
This tilt of freedom toward evil has come about gradually, but it evidently stems from a humanistic and benevolent concept according to which man—the master of this world—does not bear any evil within himself, and all the defects of life are caused by misguided social systems, which must therefore be corrected."
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Harvard Commencement Address ("A World Split Apart"), June 8, 1978
1473 个评论
>>姨学家们有一个有趣，而且我认为大体正确的观点：必须坚持美国/西方至上的歧视链，在西方和非西方（或者西...
看到这个，让我有非回一下不可的欲望。
对真正想要确保自己未来的人，最合理（假定这个理是文明以及文明人的生存与繁荣之理）的选择，不是去看status quo来决定谁比较高明，是要用自己学会的历史教训和逻辑去看现实表明什么方向的选择最正确。那些人明明做出开拓未来的姿态，一昧坚持过去，说明对未来的信心不足，或者对现实的关注不够，若要坚持态度保守，也只适合真正有价值可守的人。说到底还是一样的毛病：自相矛盾，也就只能自欺欺人。这是一切自毁行为的观念前提。这种类型最明显的症状，就是用的词句基本上多年不变。把过去几年中同一个月份的抽出来一起看，你可能自己一个人笑得打滚。
历史给人的教训是：意识形态只是善思索的人对现实的反应，要满足的首先是期望，不是事实上会如何。意识形态最好也只能算顾眼前而不顾以后的东西。意识形态作为精神刺激只能风骚一时，哪怕今后的时代还可能出现卖弄风骚的机会。就像回潮的新马主义。刘仲敬提倡的当然也不例外。
过去的历史教训可做今后的参考，但今后的路不是历史教训决定的，是愿意学或者不愿意学教训的人。人的身上当然都有历史的惯性，区别在于前者可能有新的希望，后者不管希望什么都只能重复受罪。
现在西方文明是人类文明的最高峰，在未来几个世纪内都将继续是。但「东升西降」还是对了一小半，虽然比较用的标准和自我感觉都离现实太远。现在的西方和三十年前的西方自己比，那的确是在变衰，不过和事实上降得更快的「东方」比，其实相对速度还是升，距离还是在拉大。而梁家河同志所感觉到的「升」，其实是现在的梁家河同志和四十年前的他自己所历所闻的比较，这种感觉对他而言当然是真得不能再真了。他犯的毛病就和刘仲敬所说的那些一样，用过去保证自己的未来。不是说不该有信心，而是信心要放在事实上，放在自己身上。依靠自己对现实的认知，思考，判断和行动力，不可以放在眼前或者过去某个时刻得到的理论上，还把理论看成是未来现实的绝对基础。历史的教训：号称碾碎一切理论的共产主义也只能服从现实。不想面对现实的人，现实一定要用他们来给人上课。
梁家河与王岐山的信心都来自「我们党」的实绩（保住政权，发展壮大），刘仲敬的信心来自类似股票交易系统回溯测试的「歧视链」，环保左的信心来自《寂静的春天》一类的scripture以及不时补充的「气候变化」（全球变暖这个词已经不能用了，因此最好是假装没发生过，新能源与再生能源大旗更是绝对不能倒）。最近普京也用行动表明了他的信心是「伟大俄罗斯」和「有能力的俄罗斯军队」这一意识形态与过去实绩的组合。猜猜，普京忘了什么呢？
如果要我从这些现实和历史教训中找到自己的信心，那只能是：现实不等于过去的延伸，但一定会将过去继续延长，以某种形式。那份未知，我得押上自己的一切资源和能力去面对，而且绝不能假定自己的结论、理论、推论可以处理一切，或者把向人证明这一点看得比它是否真正对现实有效还重要。
除非那就是我的目的。
--------------------------------
居然还记得密码，真佩服我自己的记忆力。不知普京大大愿意出多少石油来买？
