右翼分子吐槽扯淡专楼
"The defense of individual rights has reached such extremes as to make society as a whole defenseless against certain individuals. It is time, in the West, to defend not so much human rights as human obligations.
On the other hand, destructive and irresponsible freedom has been granted boundless space. Society has turned out to have scarce defense against the abyss of human decadence, for example against the misuse of liberty for moral violence against young people, such as motion pictures full of pornography, crime, and horror. This is all considered to be part of freedom and to be counterbalanced, in theory, by the young people’s right not to look and not to accept. Life organized legalistically has thus shown its inability to defend itself against the corrosion of evil.
......
This tilt of freedom toward evil has come about gradually, but it evidently stems from a humanistic and benevolent concept according to which man—the master of this world—does not bear any evil within himself, and all the defects of life are caused by misguided social systems, which must therefore be corrected."
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Harvard Commencement Address ("A World Split Apart"), June 8, 1978
On the other hand, destructive and irresponsible freedom has been granted boundless space. Society has turned out to have scarce defense against the abyss of human decadence, for example against the misuse of liberty for moral violence against young people, such as motion pictures full of pornography, crime, and horror. This is all considered to be part of freedom and to be counterbalanced, in theory, by the young people’s right not to look and not to accept. Life organized legalistically has thus shown its inability to defend itself against the corrosion of evil.
......
This tilt of freedom toward evil has come about gradually, but it evidently stems from a humanistic and benevolent concept according to which man—the master of this world—does not bear any evil within himself, and all the defects of life are caused by misguided social systems, which must therefore be corrected."
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Harvard Commencement Address ("A World Split Apart"), June 8, 1978
1473 个评论
>>三观立场再一次成为价值观的直接体现 14亿的民族人口主体 永远会是个最现实的问题 他们的未来选择直接...
改变不了的时候，唯一应该干的是尊重事实。
毕竟，人只能做到自己能做的事。做不到的，只能自我欺骗。
既然一个人可以不因为「中国人」亲近什么就自己也亲近什么，那为什么不可以做到「他们的命运选择不是我的选择」？
如果光是人多就可以主宰谁谁谁的命运，那么罗马帝国肯定还是罗马人的帝国，那个过去的自由美国肯定也还是过去那个自由的美国。
甚至品葱的所谓「加速主义」，红迪浪人的翻译运动，到今天也肯定是没机会成为敏感词的。参与的人是被「少数改变」的呢？还是「多数」一起决定「改变」？显然都不是，自己为自己负责的行动而已。正因为着眼于「做得到的事」，哪怕再小，也有「做得到的结果」。而不是像刘晓波之流永远做着梦，所以其后继者们还会做着「与白区党合流」这种梦，显然是当年与赵紫阳那种白区党合流的梦还没做完。
其实归结到最后就这么简单一个问题：个人的行动，从开始到结束，是不是个人绝对主宰，绝对负责？
如果承认「命运源于行动」，那么个人当然负责自己的命运，二十世纪的现实不也证明了吗？
环境永远是环境，既不会主动喂养保护你，也不会主动围猎追杀你。你是能行动的人，不是只能被推着走的浪花。何况你置身的环境与我不同，你在一个至少目前仍可以自由发言的社会里生活，而且将来也是看得见也摸得着的。
如果你因为恐惧或是什么别的，一路信到了个人层面的「环境决定论」，那么我建议先从论证这一思考的基础开始，自己去看看自己的话到底自相矛盾在哪里。
