右翼分子吐槽扯淡专楼
"The defense of individual rights has reached such extremes as to make society as a whole defenseless against certain individuals. It is time, in the West, to defend not so much human rights as human obligations.
On the other hand, destructive and irresponsible freedom has been granted boundless space. Society has turned out to have scarce defense against the abyss of human decadence, for example against the misuse of liberty for moral violence against young people, such as motion pictures full of pornography, crime, and horror. This is all considered to be part of freedom and to be counterbalanced, in theory, by the young people’s right not to look and not to accept. Life organized legalistically has thus shown its inability to defend itself against the corrosion of evil.
......
This tilt of freedom toward evil has come about gradually, but it evidently stems from a humanistic and benevolent concept according to which man—the master of this world—does not bear any evil within himself, and all the defects of life are caused by misguided social systems, which must therefore be corrected."
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Harvard Commencement Address ("A World Split Apart"), June 8, 1978
On the other hand, destructive and irresponsible freedom has been granted boundless space. Society has turned out to have scarce defense against the abyss of human decadence, for example against the misuse of liberty for moral violence against young people, such as motion pictures full of pornography, crime, and horror. This is all considered to be part of freedom and to be counterbalanced, in theory, by the young people’s right not to look and not to accept. Life organized legalistically has thus shown its inability to defend itself against the corrosion of evil.
......
This tilt of freedom toward evil has come about gradually, but it evidently stems from a humanistic and benevolent concept according to which man—the master of this world—does not bear any evil within himself, and all the defects of life are caused by misguided social systems, which must therefore be corrected."
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Harvard Commencement Address ("A World Split Apart"), June 8, 1978
1473 个评论
>>理论的确是这样的。但当维吾尔人这样的群体完全走入历史，维吾尔这个身份和他们的信仰完全被遗忘，那么很明...
如你这般「外人的评价」不影响他们「自己的选择」。至于如何评价，更是无所谓。
决定命运的并不是嘴上说的任何东西，是每一天，每一分的自身意愿化成的行动。所谓「进入历史」的，是这种实实在在的行动，不是谁谁谁的口水。
这种构成每一分钟，每一小时，每一天，每一年的「行动」，才叫「选择」。
犹太人全世界漫游，五月花的清教徒选择告别旧世界，罗马的天主教徒抛弃地位财富后进入沙漠深处的修道院，当今的阿米什社区选择过一种和现代文明保持距离的生活。那种押上了自己命的行动，就是真正的「选择」，不是嘴上说的任何东西。当初的维吾尔人，只不过不知道自己的「选择」有那种重要性而已。至于谁该责备，谁该背锅，那是另一个领域的问题了。
这种「选择」不是人的「正义」这个词所能够达到的领域。除非谁要因为「自己认准的正义」采取了实际的行动，变成他自己每一天乃至每一小时的生活实践，但就算如此，决定人命运的，变成历史的，都依然是「行动」，不是当时嘴上说得响亮的「正义」。普京的「历史修正主义」批判得再爽，如果他不投入军队，发起战争去实践，谁有多少空鸟他吗？
再举一个小得不值得注意的例子，比如现在已经销声匿迹的 STEM 教徒们，他们嘴上说与不说，我是否再拿他们开涮，对他们自己的「命运选择」以及随之而来的下场，能有多大影响？
另外，如果你觉得「现实会走入历史」，那又凭什么认定「正义」这种基本停留在嘴上的现实不会？
---------------------------------
第二点：逻辑和「选择」并没有什么关系，也不决定那「选择」有什么价值，或者性质。逻辑是存在的法则，但不决定存在与否本身。
针对俄罗斯的「选择」，和针对新疆的「选择」，从主体到客体没有任何逻辑联系，除了「它们是不同对象」之外。既然不同，那凭什么得坚持有「相同待遇」呢？
你的「正义」？
如你自己所言，说不定哪天早上一睁眼，就是（既不重要也无意义）的「历史」了。
---------------------------------
「表达自己」的观点，不是非得靠「否定他人」的观点才能够顺利完成。
值得争论的也不是观点，而是对现实的认知。
「民族存亡」这种价值也好，正义也罢，本身就是「历史」的建构，教育的积累。认同或者不认同，并不是问题，一直停留在别人给你搭好的台子上，从开始舞到结束才是。
当然，以上对事实的认知也包含了我的价值判断。认同或者不认同，都不是问题。
