右翼分子吐槽扯淡专楼
"The defense of individual rights has reached such extremes as to make society as a whole defenseless against certain individuals. It is time, in the West, to defend not so much human rights as human obligations.
On the other hand, destructive and irresponsible freedom has been granted boundless space. Society has turned out to have scarce defense against the abyss of human decadence, for example against the misuse of liberty for moral violence against young people, such as motion pictures full of pornography, crime, and horror. This is all considered to be part of freedom and to be counterbalanced, in theory, by the young people’s right not to look and not to accept. Life organized legalistically has thus shown its inability to defend itself against the corrosion of evil.
......
This tilt of freedom toward evil has come about gradually, but it evidently stems from a humanistic and benevolent concept according to which man—the master of this world—does not bear any evil within himself, and all the defects of life are caused by misguided social systems, which must therefore be corrected."
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Harvard Commencement Address ("A World Split Apart"), June 8, 1978
On the other hand, destructive and irresponsible freedom has been granted boundless space. Society has turned out to have scarce defense against the abyss of human decadence, for example against the misuse of liberty for moral violence against young people, such as motion pictures full of pornography, crime, and horror. This is all considered to be part of freedom and to be counterbalanced, in theory, by the young people’s right not to look and not to accept. Life organized legalistically has thus shown its inability to defend itself against the corrosion of evil.
......
This tilt of freedom toward evil has come about gradually, but it evidently stems from a humanistic and benevolent concept according to which man—the master of this world—does not bear any evil within himself, and all the defects of life are caused by misguided social systems, which must therefore be corrected."
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Harvard Commencement Address ("A World Split Apart"), June 8, 1978
1473 个评论
>>感谢您的好意 但不必为我申诉了 恩怨已久 站方是不会理睬的 还容易得罪他们 没有必要 保重 再次别过...
是时候把才说过的话重复一遍了：“对历史和现实的法则，千万别以为自己可以‘改变它’，那是一种错觉。”
某些人坚持认定，现实由自己决定，或者由自己相信的那些“至高无上的正义”决定，那是因为没有面对真实的胆量，所以绝对不能自己面对自己的缺陷。
反虚伪胜过重真实的，终成虚伪，恨邪恶胜过守良善的，终成邪恶。自己的执着取代目的及其原则之后，新的“神圣不可侵犯”，或者说“能将一切正当化”，从而“引领众生”的新（神）偶像，就顺利降生了。
命运是自己选的，是每一天，每一分，每一秒的意识和行动所在。
我又忍不住重复一遍，虽然知道说再多次也只能期望自己能力之外的“某种东西”能产生作用。
------------------------------
你的遭遇并不觉得意外，只是没想到居然不是我先啊？大概是认定“不具希望”之后，便干干脆脆彻底无视的态度所带来的，也即是乔治·奥威尔所指出的，所谓“安全的局外人”的位置吧？
但这种“真实的态度”，是没有办法靠迁就或是伪装来维持的，那没有意义，还是一句老话：世界观不能作伪。
近两年前，我就决定将品葱作为自己混汉语圈的最后一站了，因为已经过了还有拓宽活动的意义的时候。没想到如今还能在自己的眼前，亲自见证“世界的划分”以活灵活现的生动形式展开。何其幸运。
前几天，程晓农在新的一期《政经最前线》里说过的话：今后世界的经济全球化将变成双轨，有中国的，和没中国的。
考虑到这个世界从来没有孤立现象的事实状态，加上眼前的见证，现在可以对其观点补上一句：“今后的人类文明的趋向，也将一分为二。”
咱们会属于哪一边，当然是多年前就已经做出过选择了。如今不过是确认而已。
很不幸的是，在 Gab Social 那边的氛围虽然没到这地步，然而也有恶化的迹象。对了， rightdog tv 已经搬到 Gab 去了。因为我们都清楚，reddit 属于哪一边。
而且， Google 是“不太容易”搜到相关内容的，特别是你“不指定站点”，或是有“用其他语言”、“敲的空格多了一个”诸如此类的“不可辨识的错误”的话。其中根本性的“技术性”原因，当然我们也一样清楚 ，无非一颗叫做“阵营”的螺丝。
------------------------------
以前在品葱说过的，一句基本上没什么注意的话，很不幸地又应验了：道路的选择，最终决定阵营的归属。
坚持要相信，“现实由自己做出来”，这本身难道不是一种时时刻刻分分秒秒的选择？ 不是一种认知和思考的先决条件？
从历史上的过去到现在，之所以各种各样的“进步”最后都“殊途同归”，无非就是最简单的逻辑在现实中的体现：既然认知和思考的前提一致，那么包括从各种念头到各种行动，乃至各种“意外”带来的刺激所引发的应激反应，对准的终点就只有那一個。
“活在战场是一种怎样的体验”？
这个最近一段时间的热点问题，若是就精神面的战场而言，我倒是已有最适合装蒜的答案：“大家都有充分的机会亲自经历，亲自总结。”
