一些唧唧喳喳的日记

>>If you're using such term to describe people with ...

It’s a catch-22. If I say nothing, there is a risk you might be offended by my criticism on Turks, and if I express my intention not to cause offense, you might be offended by how it is brought up. But I cannot remove mentioning Ottomans neither, otherwise it will cause the entire logic to collapse, due to how it was centered about the events in Constantinople.

And I clearly understand your annoyance (and perhaps anger) because it is a matter about yourself, and how you’re perceived, deeply embedded in your soul, just like if you’re a boy or girl. And those elements, further define your personalities. (And how depriving them can destroy yourself, as I mentioned, in that long discussion centering castration). Yet, I ran out of room of making choices during the conversation, because either way, the risk remains high. And those are the instances that the communication with proper emotional intentions reach its limit in writing during personally attached dialogues. Content cannot be precisely expressed with the intended emotions, despite the best intentions. If I were talking to you in person, I would have real time feedback from your facial expression to word it carefully. I think it is me who needs your forgivess, even though I have feared your displeasure.

But I feel, the timeless heroism is the center of the topic and this is what bonds us together. It is what we pledge to, and what we defend. We fight like the Romans. (Because I believe, the USA is the Rome of our era)